“…At present, there are no definitive criteria for the distinction of class III or IV lesions from class II. Nonetheless, the progressive increase in number of abnormal features, including increasing age of the patient, tumor diameter greater than 1 cm, asymmetry, ulceration, aberrant nodular or sheet-like growth, severe cytological atypia, necrosis, mitotic rates at least 3 to 6 per mm 2 (depending on patient age), loss of p16 expression, diffuse (ie >75% nuclear, grade 4+) expression of PRAME , Ki67 greater than 10% to 20%, 3 or more genetic alterations or copy number variations (as seen in melanoma), CDKN2A biallelic deletions, TERT promoter alterations, and BAP1 alterations in blue nevus–derived tumors, are associated with increasing probability for melanoma . Thus, because of frequent confusion with melanoma, complete removal of these lesions is considered prudent standard practice in line with class II lesions.…”