IECON 2017 - 43rd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iecon.2017.8217455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards energy efficient sensor nodes for online activity recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other researchers found that low-power activity recognition may rely on more effective use of the sensing device. Grutzmacher et al [27] and Elsts et al [28] relegate the feature extraction work to the device rather than the server, which lowers the overall energy consumption because of a decreased need for data transmission. Bhat et al [29] found that they could achieve activity recognition accuracy as high as 97.7% even with a low-power IoT device, and Braojos et al [19] achieved up to 97.2% accuracy with low-power wearable nodes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers found that low-power activity recognition may rely on more effective use of the sensing device. Grutzmacher et al [27] and Elsts et al [28] relegate the feature extraction work to the device rather than the server, which lowers the overall energy consumption because of a decreased need for data transmission. Bhat et al [29] found that they could achieve activity recognition accuracy as high as 97.7% even with a low-power IoT device, and Braojos et al [19] achieved up to 97.2% accuracy with low-power wearable nodes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches, orthogonal to those aforementioned, study the on-board calculation of the feature extraction stage of activity recognition systems. In [14][15][16][17][18][19], it was shown that calculating features on the wireless sensor nodes could reduce the energy consumption of their wireless transceivers or flash memories due to the reduced amounts of data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28][29][30]. Since this stage often drastically reduces the data rate, as a relatively small number of features is calculated from a large number of samples of a window, it was subject to a lot of research to perform this stage as near to the sensor as possible, i.e., on board of a wireless sensor node [14][15][16]18,19], or even on-sensor [17,21]. However, each application-specific setup varies in sensor sampling frequency, sliding window size, sliding window overlap, and number of features and their computational effort in calculating them.…”
Section: Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, in activity recognition settings with wearable sensor nodes, data collected at sampling frequencies of e.g., 100 Hz has either to be stored for longer periods of time or transmitted via wireless interfaces. The motivation to reduce sensor data already on the wearable sensor node results from the significant energy consumption introduced by either transmitting raw sensor data wirelessly [ 5 , 8 ] or by storing it to flash memory for later offline processing [ 9 ]. Both consumes a significant amount of energy on wearable sensor nodes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%