2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2016.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards enhancing the last-mile delivery: An effective crowd-tasking model with scalable solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
162
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 284 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
162
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, as citizens are more flexible and interconnected than traditional logistics service providers (LSPs), the number of failed deliveries can be reduced. In addition, integrating the crowd with other initiatives such as small load containers and pick-own-parcel stations potentially provides sustainability advantages in the future [4,27].…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as citizens are more flexible and interconnected than traditional logistics service providers (LSPs), the number of failed deliveries can be reduced. In addition, integrating the crowd with other initiatives such as small load containers and pick-own-parcel stations potentially provides sustainability advantages in the future [4,27].…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using crowdsourcing, the emissions of pollutants, such as nitrogen oxides, PM2.5, and PM10 from cargo trucks, can be reduced by about 55% [13]. Research has also shown that crowd logistics can reduce the pressure on the urban transportation system, improve the distribution efficiency of urban logistics, and cut down carbon emissions [9,[14][15][16]. In addition, Melo and Macharis have proposed that crowd logistics could provide benefits for all stakeholders in the last-mile delivery process (e.g., better services for customers, additional revenue for crowdsourcing operators, and profits for platform providers) [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The destination can either be consumers' homes or, increasingly, their workplaces (McKinnon and Tallam, 2003). The mode of delivery can be in-sourced (using retailer's own vehicle fleet), outsourced to a third-party logistics provider (3PL) (Boyer and Hult, 2005), or crowd-sourced using independent contractors (Wang et al, 2016). When selecting a distribution channel, retailers need to trade-off between fulfilment capabilities, inventory levels , product availability and variety (Agatz et al, 2008), transportation cost (Rabinovich et al, 2008), and responsiveness (Chopra, 2003).…”
Section: Review Of Lml Distribution Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intersection between last-mile operations and "sharing economy" models With the exception of one paper (Wang et al, 2016), the majority of the extant literature discusses conventional LML models. Given the rapidly growing sharing economy that generates innovative business models (e.g.…”
Section: Operational Challenges In Executing Last-mile Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%