“…Alongside the dimension of politics and power in learning, studies have increasingly attended to the socioaxiological as an underexamined and yet core dimension of the study and design of learning (Bang et al, 2015; Booker, 2016; Elliott-Groves & Meixi, 2022; Marin et al, 2020; Meixi, 2022; Nzinga, 2023b; Nzinga & Medin, 2018). We draw on Bang et al’s (2015) work on the axiological in community-based design research to use socioaxiological to refer to the underlying relational, ethical, and aesthetic qualities, assumption, and structures that undergird the theories, contexts, and practices of “what is good, right, true, and beautiful—that shape current and possible meaning, meaning-making, positioning, and relations in cultural ecologies” (p. 29).…”