2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards high-efficiency industrial p-type mono-like Si PERC solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cast mono‐like silicon solar cells can achieve much higher efficiency than mc silicon solar cells, which is even close to the efficiency performance of Cz silicon solar cells 92 . For instance, Y. Lv et al 3 reported that PERC solar cells prepared from p‐type cast mono‐like silicon wafers are able to achieve an average efficiency of 22.2%, which is slightly lower than the Cz monocrystalline silicon counterparts at 22.8% for PERC structure. Moreover, cast mono‐like silicon is grown by casting method, and therefore, its cost is much cheaper than Cz silicon.…”
Section: Cell Efficiency Potential Of Cast Mono‐like Siliconmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cast mono‐like silicon solar cells can achieve much higher efficiency than mc silicon solar cells, which is even close to the efficiency performance of Cz silicon solar cells 92 . For instance, Y. Lv et al 3 reported that PERC solar cells prepared from p‐type cast mono‐like silicon wafers are able to achieve an average efficiency of 22.2%, which is slightly lower than the Cz monocrystalline silicon counterparts at 22.8% for PERC structure. Moreover, cast mono‐like silicon is grown by casting method, and therefore, its cost is much cheaper than Cz silicon.…”
Section: Cell Efficiency Potential Of Cast Mono‐like Siliconmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods can both enhance the efficiency and passed yield (wafers to cells) of the cells made on the refined wafers. Please note that the cell efficiency (PERC solar cells) and passed yield of the cells depend on the position of the wafers in the ingot 3 . Typically, the wafers from the bottom part (except for “red zone”) of the ingot can achieve a relatively high efficiency and passed yield (for instance, average 22.2% efficiency and 95% passed yield for PERC), whereas the wafers from the middle and top parts of the ingot can only achieve a relatively low efficiency and passed yield (for instance, <21.8% average efficiency and <90% passed yield for PERC) 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, to further improve the efficiency, most solar cell companies are trying to develop new technologies and apply them to their production lines. The selective emitter (SE) technology has recently again attracted renewed attention, owing to its high efficiency [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it has low sheet resistance because the high doping concentration under the electrodes lowers the contact resistance, leading to an improvement in the fill factor (FF). Second, better surface passivation on the high-sheet-resistance area enhances the short-circuit current density (J SC ) and open-circuit voltage (V OC ) [6][7][8][9][10]. There are several methods to create an SE, such as dopant-paste printing [11,12], inkjet printing [13,14], etch-back [15,16], and laser techniques [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation