1999
DOI: 10.1051/jcp:1999241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards high resolution 1H NMR spectra of tannin colloidal aggregates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spectra agree reasonably with those of catechin and epicatechin standards, as shown by each of the three expanded regions corresponding to the B, A and C rings (Fig. 3b), and with those published by Berregi et al (2003) and Mirabel et al (1999).…”
Section: Enzyme Activitysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The spectra agree reasonably with those of catechin and epicatechin standards, as shown by each of the three expanded regions corresponding to the B, A and C rings (Fig. 3b), and with those published by Berregi et al (2003) and Mirabel et al (1999).…”
Section: Enzyme Activitysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In these conditions, no precipitate could be detected by visual inspection. However, NMR experiments were recorded using the HRMAS technology to take care of the colloidal behavior of these complexes that would otherwise lead to poorly resolved spectra (56).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…100 mM) in the presence of 10% ethanol as previously described. 29 The differences observed between procyanidin monomers (mainly catechin and epicatechin with the case of EGCG, which is clearly neither a monomer nor a dimer, being taken aside at the moment) and oligomers should be explained by both their 3D structures and levels of hydration. Monomers, which have a lower level of hydration than do dimers/trimers, have a relatively planar structure favoring intermolecular stacking, affording the possibility to form larger and larger micelles that are able to coalesce to form hazes or even precipitates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%