2023
DOI: 10.1080/19439342.2023.2196978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards improved and more transparent ethics in randomised controlled trials in development social science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 50 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The utility rolled out the interventions that were deemed unambiguously useful like jisomee mita training, reminders, and meter readings, and dismissed the use of pre-paid meters in this setting because of their previous experiences finding them to be difficult to maintain and costly to deploy. Guidance on alternative financial arrangements for customers was originally considered to be tested, however it was ultimately decided that anybody that to field experiments (Glennerster and Powers, 2016;Humphreys, 2015;MacKay, 2020) and offered practical guidance on how to assess and communicate the ethical considerations of a study more comprehensively (Asiedu et al, 2021;Evans, 2021). We find this to be a useful starting point to frame the ethical considerations of this research and describe how each principle guided the research process before discussing the ethical considerations of randomization of government policies.…”
Section: Figures and Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The utility rolled out the interventions that were deemed unambiguously useful like jisomee mita training, reminders, and meter readings, and dismissed the use of pre-paid meters in this setting because of their previous experiences finding them to be difficult to maintain and costly to deploy. Guidance on alternative financial arrangements for customers was originally considered to be tested, however it was ultimately decided that anybody that to field experiments (Glennerster and Powers, 2016;Humphreys, 2015;MacKay, 2020) and offered practical guidance on how to assess and communicate the ethical considerations of a study more comprehensively (Asiedu et al, 2021;Evans, 2021). We find this to be a useful starting point to frame the ethical considerations of this research and describe how each principle guided the research process before discussing the ethical considerations of randomization of government policies.…”
Section: Figures and Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%