AIP Conference Proceedings 2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3114296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Improved Finite Element Modelling of the Interaction of Elastic Waves With Complex Defect Geometries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Free meshing algorithms using linear tetrahedral elements (C3D4 in Abaqus) are commonly used for the 3D FE modelling of scattering from obstacles with irregular geometries [24,25]. As is well known, free meshing tends to randomize the distribution and the shape of each element, and thus may introduce unwanted mesh-scattering and dispersion [26]. We therefore combine two different meshing algorithms in three dimensions with a code developed using Matlab (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA).…”
Section: (B) Simulations Using Three-dimensional Rough Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Free meshing algorithms using linear tetrahedral elements (C3D4 in Abaqus) are commonly used for the 3D FE modelling of scattering from obstacles with irregular geometries [24,25]. As is well known, free meshing tends to randomize the distribution and the shape of each element, and thus may introduce unwanted mesh-scattering and dispersion [26]. We therefore combine two different meshing algorithms in three dimensions with a code developed using Matlab (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA).…”
Section: (B) Simulations Using Three-dimensional Rough Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As is well known, free meshing tends to randomize the distribution and the shape of each element, and thus may introduce unwanted mesh-scattering and dispersion [26]. We therefore combine two different meshing algorithms in three dimensions with a code developed using Matlab (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA).…”
Section: (B) Simulations Using Three-dimensional Rough Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As computational ability has increased over the past few decades, numerical methods for modelling such as the Finite Element (FE) method have become widely used for that purpose. The FE method is particularly well suited for the case with a structure of complex geometrical shape and has also benefited from new developments [1][2][3][4]. However, in spite of the advantages, the data size for the method often leads to a problem, for example, in modelling a whole component, particularly when an irregular defect is of interest, needing a very fine mesh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This can be extracted from the total field at the destination box by two processing methods: we could allow for the dimensions of the box to be large so that the incident and scattered components are separated in time, or we could subtract out the incident component from the total signal (see [13] for a more detailed discussion of these two processing approaches). The separation method usually requires larger dimensions than the subtraction method, which theoretically just requires a very small destination box for the FE calculation of the total field.…”
Section: B Back-scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Solutions to some key past impediments to the numerical modelling of wave phenomena, such as representing unbounded domains or complex features and geometries have now become accessible to the wider community via Perfectly Matched Layers and absorbing layers [4], [8]- [11] and have been directly implemented in commercial packages [12], [13]. However, these methods still lead to an enormous computational cost when dealing with large volumes of material and representing complex materials; modelling realistic transduction also remains a challenge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%