2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07440-5_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Improving the e-learning Experience for Deaf Students: e-LUX

Abstract: Deaf people are more heavily affected by the digital divide than many would expect. Moreover, most accessibility guidelines addressing their needs just deal with captioning and audio-content transcription. However, this approach to the problem does not consider that deaf people have big troubles with vocal languages, even in their written form. At present, only a few organizations, like W3C, produced guidelines dealing with one of their most distinctive expressions: Sign Language (SL). SL is, in fact, the visu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was to research e-learning design to accommodate deaf students. In [6][7][8], there is no analysis of adaptive e-learning. For this point, it is possible to indicate lessons and the learner's learning style, which adds a specific feature to e-learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was to research e-learning design to accommodate deaf students. In [6][7][8], there is no analysis of adaptive e-learning. For this point, it is possible to indicate lessons and the learner's learning style, which adds a specific feature to e-learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, it can be observed that most of them prefer to communicate using SLs (AntinoroPizzuto et al, 2010a). Therefore, dealing with the issues of deaf-oriented accessibility using only written VL is quite unrealistic (Borgia, et al, 2014), and any VL-based solution (VL captioning and transcription) to overcome the digital divide rarely solves the problem completely. In other words, captioning-based accessibility design may support the needs of people who become deaf after the acquisition of speech and language (post-lingual deafness).…”
Section: Vocal Languages Sign Languages and Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, they are far more accurate, fast, and comfortable using the paper-pencil approach rather than dealing with the (more or less) complex interaction styles of a digital editor. For this reason, the design of a new generation of SignWriting editors has been planned (Borgia et al, 2014), able to relieve the user of any, or most at least, burden related to clicking, dragging, searching, browsing on the UI during the composition process of a sign. The purpose of the designers is to implement an interaction style which is as similar as possible to the paper-pencil approach that humans normally use when writing or drawing.…”
Section: Optical Glyph Recognition For Signwriting: Sw-ogrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations