Proceedings of the 18th Australasian Document Computing Symposium 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2537734.2537748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards information retrieval evaluation with reduced and only positive judgements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 shows that with a cutoff percentage of 80%, almost 24% of the documents considered relevant were actually judged relevant by human assessors and therefore we used this set (S) in the remainder of the experiment to expand the first set of qrels generated and judge more documents as relevant using the distance measure in equation (1). Relevant documents are at a close distance to each other, and in a sense they form a cluster [13]. Now that we have considered the documents retrieved by 80% of the systems as relevant, we tried to judge more documents in the pool of depth 100 as relevant based on the distance measure in (1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 3 shows that with a cutoff percentage of 80%, almost 24% of the documents considered relevant were actually judged relevant by human assessors and therefore we used this set (S) in the remainder of the experiment to expand the first set of qrels generated and judge more documents as relevant using the distance measure in equation (1). Relevant documents are at a close distance to each other, and in a sense they form a cluster [13]. Now that we have considered the documents retrieved by 80% of the systems as relevant, we tried to judge more documents in the pool of depth 100 as relevant based on the distance measure in (1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mollá [13] used a distance based measure to expand positive judgments only. The distance measure was based on the cosine similarity measure [15] between two document vectors.…”
Section: B Mollá's Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%