2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-01970-8_45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Low-Cost, High-Accuracy Classifiers for Linear Solver Selection

Abstract: Abstract. The time to solve linear systems depends to a large extent on the choice of the solution method and the properties of the coefficient matrix. Although there are several linear solution methods, in most cases it is impossible to predict apriori which linear solver would be best suited for a given linear system. Recent investigations on selecting linear solvers for a given system have explored the use of classification techniques based on the linear system parameters for solver selection. In this paper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also limit the computation time for the most expensive features as well as the total time allowed to compute features. Bhowmick, Toth, and Raghavan (2009) consider the computational complexity of calculating problem features when selecting the features to use. They show that while achieving comparable accuracy to the full set of features, the subset of features selected by their method is significantly cheaper to compute.…”
Section: Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also limit the computation time for the most expensive features as well as the total time allowed to compute features. Bhowmick, Toth, and Raghavan (2009) consider the computational complexity of calculating problem features when selecting the features to use. They show that while achieving comparable accuracy to the full set of features, the subset of features selected by their method is significantly cheaper to compute.…”
Section: Feature Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this experiment, we use 6 linear solver, preconditioner combinations from the CULA Sparse toolkit [31], which is a GPU library for solving large sparse linear systems. Features used for this benchmark are based on the work by Bhowmick et al [5]. We use symmetric sparse matrices from [15] to represent sparse linear systems.…”
Section: Breadth-first Search (Bfs) Bfs Is Used As a Basis Formentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this experiment, we use 6 (linear solver, preconditioner) combinations from the CULA Sparse toolkit [26], which is a GPU library for solving large sparse linear systems. We select features for this benchmark based on the work by Bhowmick et al [27]. These features reflect different numerical properties of sparse matrices such as trace and 1-norm.…”
Section: Benchmarksmentioning
confidence: 99%