Towards mining sequences and dispersion of rhetorical moves in student written texts

Abstract

There is an increasing interest in the analysis of both student's writing and the temporal aspects of learning data. The analysis of higher-level learning features in writing contexts requires analyses of data that could be characterised in terms of the sequences and processes of textual features present. This paper (1) discusses the extant literature on sequential and process analyses of writing; and, based on this and our own first-hand experience on sequential analysis, (2) proposes a number of approaches to both pre-process and analyse sequences in whole-texts. We illustrate how the approaches could be applied to examples drawn from our own datasets of 'rhetorical moves' in written texts, and the potential each approach holds for providing insight into that data. Work is in progress to apply this model to provide empirical insights. Although, similar sequence or process mining techniques have not yet been applied to student writing, techniques applied to event data could readily be operationalised to undercover patterns in texts.

How to provide automated feedback on the writing process? A participatory approach to design writing analytics tools

“…AESs are grading systems that can be used for summative assessment, to replace or assist teachers in assessing writing quality (Dikli, 2006), for example e-rater (Attali & Burstein, 2006). By contrast, AWEs are intended as formative assessment tools, providing more detailed feedback and correction suggestions (Cotos, 2015), for example Criterion (Link, Dursun, Karakaya, & Hegelheimer, 2014) and AWA/AcaWriter (Knight, Shibani, Abel, Gibson, & Ryan, 2020, Knight, Martinez-Maldonado, Gibson, & Buckingham Shum, 2017. ITSs are the most complex systems.…”

Towards Reflective Writing Analytics: Rationale, Methodology and Preliminary Results

“…Preliminary steps on this front are reported by Knight, Maldonado-Martinez, Gibson, and Buckingham Shum (2017).…”