Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3408877.3432361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Modeling Student Engagement with Interactive Computing Textbooks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By the end of the second week, most of the students were not only comfortable editing the existing notebooks, but also capable of creating new Jupyter notebooks on the JupyterHub to carry out their self-directed research. Their feedback on the merits of the Jupyter Book-powered curriculum aligns with the results reported in previous research on the benefits of interactive textbooks. , …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By the end of the second week, most of the students were not only comfortable editing the existing notebooks, but also capable of creating new Jupyter notebooks on the JupyterHub to carry out their self-directed research. Their feedback on the merits of the Jupyter Book-powered curriculum aligns with the results reported in previous research on the benefits of interactive textbooks. , …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The content in the page, here rendered from a Jupyter notebook, 15 the Jupyter Book-powered curriculum aligns with the results reported in previous research on the benefits of interactive textbooks. 31,32 Figure 2 shows the results from the final student survey on how well the curriculum achieved the learning outcomes of the module. There was a strong level of agreement, consistent with our observations of their final presentations (e.g., hearing comments about the importance of cleaning data, or how ML can be a helpful guide for experiments�not a replacement).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies test the effectiveness of themed modules or topics within the geosciences (Gilbert et al, 2019;McNeal et al, 2014McNeal et al, , 2020 and report on increased student engagement and achieved learning goals. While modeling student engagement specifically with interactive digital textbooks, like those built upon Jupyter Notebooks, Smith et al (2021) found that active interaction was significantly more effective than reading time in predicting student performance. Students reported a preference for interactive works that enabled them to step through concepts by manipulating example code, visualizations, and other interactive elements.…”
Section: Oer In Stemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the tool, users can compare current and previous experiments, querying sequences of executions using SPARQL. From a training perspective, Smith et al [20] introduce a study on modeling student engagement with Jupyter notebooks. For their study, they consider metrics such as amount of time a student interacts with the notebook, and the number of times students execute and modify cells.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%