Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3343055.3359698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards More Practical Spacing for Smartphone Touch GUI Objects Accompanied by Distractors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For target pointing tasks in PC environments, Komarov et al (2013) found that crowdsourced and lab-based experiments led to the same conclusions on user performance, such as that a novel facilitation technique called Bubble Cursor (Grossman and Balakrishnan, 2005) reduced the MT compared with the baseline point-and-click method. Yamanaka et al (2019) tested the effects of target margins on touch-pointing performance using smartphones and reported that the same effects were consistently found in crowdsourced and lab-based experiments, e.g., wider margins significantly decreased the MT but increased the ER. Findlater et al (2017) showed that crowdworkers had significantly shorter MTs and higher ERs than lab-based participants in both mouse-and touch-pointing tasks.…”
Section: Crowdsourced Studies On User Performance and Model Evaluatio...mentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For target pointing tasks in PC environments, Komarov et al (2013) found that crowdsourced and lab-based experiments led to the same conclusions on user performance, such as that a novel facilitation technique called Bubble Cursor (Grossman and Balakrishnan, 2005) reduced the MT compared with the baseline point-and-click method. Yamanaka et al (2019) tested the effects of target margins on touch-pointing performance using smartphones and reported that the same effects were consistently found in crowdsourced and lab-based experiments, e.g., wider margins significantly decreased the MT but increased the ER. Findlater et al (2017) showed that crowdworkers had significantly shorter MTs and higher ERs than lab-based participants in both mouse-and touch-pointing tasks.…”
Section: Crowdsourced Studies On User Performance and Model Evaluatio...mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…However, some mouse-users might use touchpads in actuality, as we had instructed to use mice. Similar concerns have been reported before: for touch pointing tasks with smartphones, researchers could not confirm whether workers tapped a target with their thumb as instructed (Yamanaka et al, 2019). Some other crowdsourcing platforms support an option that task requesters can ask workers to shoot a video when they perform a task, e.g., UIScope (http:// uiscope.com/en).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For research involving user experiments on graphical user interfaces (GUIs), it has recently become more common to recruit workers through crowdsourcing services (Cockburn et al 2020;Findlater et al 2017;Komarov, Reinecke, and Gajos 2013;Matejka et al 2016;Yamanaka, Shimono, and Miyashita 2019). Previous studies have typically focused on designing better GUIs or conducting user experiments to evaluate novel interaction techniques compared with baselines to demonstrate that a proposed method is statistically better than a baseline.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%