2015
DOI: 10.3233/ao-150155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards ontology-driven situation-aware disaster management

Abstract: Over the last years, numerous ICT applications with mechanisms to detect situations have been developed to support disaster management (DM), which is a field of a great societal and economic importance. Those applications are termed situation-aware (SA) because they try, in near real-time, to perceive and comprehend a situation of some type (e.g. disease epidemics) and project a reaction to the detected situation (e.g. isolate diseased people). An obstacle to the modelling of SA applications is the lack of wel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The conceptual part supports the modelling language constructs of the specification part, which is mapped onto the appropriate technology implementations by our MDE process, where implementation is (partially) generated by MDE transformations. Horizontal (same abstraction level) exogenous (different languages) transformations are applied at the specification level to integrate models, while vertical transformations are applied to generate code, as described by Moreira et al (2015a;2015b). For example, SAREF4health was specified (designed) with support of OntoUML, along with the model validation approach, while the RDF implementation was (partially) generated from pre-defined MDE transformations from OntoUML to RDF (Moreira et al, 2016).…”
Section: Design Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conceptual part supports the modelling language constructs of the specification part, which is mapped onto the appropriate technology implementations by our MDE process, where implementation is (partially) generated by MDE transformations. Horizontal (same abstraction level) exogenous (different languages) transformations are applied at the specification level to integrate models, while vertical transformations are applied to generate code, as described by Moreira et al (2015a;2015b). For example, SAREF4health was specified (designed) with support of OntoUML, along with the model validation approach, while the RDF implementation was (partially) generated from pre-defined MDE transformations from OntoUML to RDF (Moreira et al, 2016).…”
Section: Design Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SAREF4Health was designed in the scope of a broader development, namely the "SEmantic Modeldriven development for IoT Interoperability of emergenCy serviceS" (SEMIoTICS) framework (Moreira et al, 2015a;2015b;Moreira et al, 2018c). SEMIoTICS aims at improving the semantic interoperability of Early Warning Systems (EWS) and their components, i.e., it can be used to develop semantic interoperable IoT-based EWS for emergency notification services.…”
Section: Saref4health Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Engineering (DOLCE) adalah ontologi dasar yang diperluas untuk pola diskripsi dan situasi untuk memberikan formalitas situasi kontekstual untuk mendukung desain ontologi ini [7] . General formal ontology ( GFO) juga merupakan ontologi dasar yang memberikan gagasan tentang situasi [8] . UFO dikandung dari DOLCE dan GFO untuk mendapatkan perhatian dari komunitas ontologi formal karena kemajuan yang menjanjikan pada praktik permodelan konseptual yang digerakkan oleh ontologi [9] .…”
Section: Descriptive Ontology For Linguistic and Cognitiveunclassified
“…OntoUML adalah bahasa yang matang untung menggambarkan ontologi inti , bahasa pola, dan bahasa khusus domain [12] . Yang telah diterapkan dalam beberapa penelitian sebelumnya terakit peristiwa, resiko dan rencana pada situasi darurat guna menuju manajemen bencana yan berbasis ontologi [8].…”
Section: Descriptive Ontology For Linguistic and Cognitiveunclassified
“…Therefore, ultimately, by improving the foundations of the DM core ontology, the IoT EWS using the ontology as a context model can provide a higher quality situation awareness and, thus, improved semantics. As foundations to support the choices made here we studied the Barewisean situation semantics theory, its extension for the GFO ontology (the Situoid theory), the perdurantism theory behind UFO and the Endsley`s SA theory for human factors [72]. In particular, the situoid theory [184] deals with this issue by including the concept of situoid, a perdurant element that is the composition of snapshots (situations) in time.…”
Section: Situation Foundations For Context Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%