2022
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2022.867695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards operational phytoplankton recognition with automated high-throughput imaging, near-real-time data processing, and convolutional neural networks

Abstract: Plankton communities form the basis of aquatic ecosystems and elucidating their role in increasingly important environmental issues is a persistent research question. Recent technological advances in automated microscopic imaging, together with cloud platforms for high-performance computing, have created possibilities for collecting and processing detailed high-frequency data on planktonic communities, opening new horizons for testing core hypotheses in aquatic ecosystems. Analyzing continuous streams of big d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While high accuracy can be obtained on 'rebalanced' test data with equal representation of all classes (Branco et al 2015, Kraft et al 2022, this is not representative of real-world performance. (Bochinski et al 2019) handle an imbalanced dataset by first training on a balanced subdivision of the complete dataset, only sampling as many images for each class as are available for the least present class.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While high accuracy can be obtained on 'rebalanced' test data with equal representation of all classes (Branco et al 2015, Kraft et al 2022, this is not representative of real-world performance. (Bochinski et al 2019) handle an imbalanced dataset by first training on a balanced subdivision of the complete dataset, only sampling as many images for each class as are available for the least present class.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A number of plankton classification studies have used probability filtering, in which automatic classification results are discarded when the maximum inferred probability is below some (possibly class-specific) threshold (Luo et al 2018, Guo et al 2021, Kraft et al 2022. This technique reduces the number of incorrect images, but leaves some images unclassified, possibly biasing the estimated class frequencies or relationships with environmental drivers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phytoplankton data from Utö IFCB can be currently classified near real-time into 50 different classes as described by [48]. Putative parasite infection images were manually annotated by experts using another Utö data collected between February-August 2021, using phytoplankton data from nine classes.…”
Section: Phytoplankton Anomaly Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our experiments, we use a phytoplankton anomaly dataset derived from the annotated images used to train the classifier described in the previous paragraph with the OK samples from the dataset published in [48] and the NOK samples from the unpublished 2021 Utö data. It contains over 6200 manually annotated and expert-validated samples throughout 9 plankton species with known anomalies as is shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Phytoplankton Anomaly Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process of using autonomous underwater explorers to explore the seabed, the detection and perception accuracy of the vision system is relatively high. For example, for challenging problems such as insufficient ambient light, related research studies have used convolutional neural networks to detect and identify marine organisms (Li et al, 2020;Xu et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2021;Kraft et al, 2022). However, using target detection to achieve target object positioning is still not accurate enough.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%