2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1570-0232(02)00730-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards proteome database of Francisella tularensis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 and 3). While our optimized method was rigorous and subject to some experimental variability (see Results), our results appear to have much greater utility than those garnered from the use of detergents, lithium chloride, or sodium carbonate (2,20,33,41,46,51). We identified 15 bona fide F. tularensis OMPs, which colocalized at densities between 1.17 and 1.20 g/ml.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 and 3). While our optimized method was rigorous and subject to some experimental variability (see Results), our results appear to have much greater utility than those garnered from the use of detergents, lithium chloride, or sodium carbonate (2,20,33,41,46,51). We identified 15 bona fide F. tularensis OMPs, which colocalized at densities between 1.17 and 1.20 g/ml.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…More than 1,500 proteins were visualized when total cellular proteins were solubilized from F. tularensis and separated by 2DE (20). However, only three of those identified by mass spectrometry were proposed to be membrane proteins, including TUL4.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, a Bfr protein spot unique to F. tularensis subsp. holarctica was recently reported in a comparative proteome analysis of the bacterial cell lysates from F. tularensis subspecies holarctica and tularensis (17). Analysis of the cytosol of F. tularensis-infected macrophages demonstrated that KatG and GroEL were released into the host cell cytosol.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…6). Previous Francisella proteomics studies have catalogued LVS protein profiles [29,30], immune reactive proteins [31], or stress response proteins [32]. A proteomic comparison of three Francisella strains has been performed, identifying many protein differences [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%