2007
DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2007/03/109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards reduction of type II theories on SU(3) structure manifolds

Abstract: Abstract:We revisit the reduction of type II supergravity on SU(3) structure manifolds conjectured to lead to gauged N = 2 supergravity in 4 dimensions. The reduction proceeds by expanding the invariant 2-and 3-forms of the SU(3) structure as well as the gauge potentials of the type II theory in the same set of forms, the analogues of harmonic forms in the case of Calabi-Yau reductions. By focussing on the metric sector, we arrive at a list of constraints these expansion forms should satisfy to yield a base po… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
162
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(165 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
3
162
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such conditions arise from demanding that the local special Kähler geometry of the untruncated theory descends to the moduli space of truncated modes. (Note the question of when such truncations exist remains an open problem, see also [50].) Upon meeting these conditions, the resulting theory is a four-dimensional N = 2 supergravity, with generically massive antisymmetric tensors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such conditions arise from demanding that the local special Kähler geometry of the untruncated theory descends to the moduli space of truncated modes. (Note the question of when such truncations exist remains an open problem, see also [50].) Upon meeting these conditions, the resulting theory is a four-dimensional N = 2 supergravity, with generically massive antisymmetric tensors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we do not address directly the question of when such truncations exist, but simply derive a set of consistency conditions for the effective theory to be N = 2 supersymmetric. (These issues are discussed in detail in [50].) Given such a truncation, we identify the backgrounds mirror to a Calabi-Yau compactification with magnetic H-flux, the case which was missing from the analysis of [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constructing such torsional analogues of harmonic forms is quite similar to finding an appropriate basis of p-forms to perform dimensional reduction on SU(3)-structure manifolds [54,[60][61][62], since both problems deal with p-forms that are invisible to de Rham cohomology and correspond to the internal profile of massive 4d modes. with ω tor r−1 a globally well-defined (r − 1)-form, and k ∈ Z such that kα tor r is trivial also in Tor H r (M D , Z).…”
Section: Massive Rr U(1)'s From Torsionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since ω tor r−1 is globally well-defined, we can expand an RR potential C p on it. 11 Indeed, we will argue below that both α tor r and ω tor r−1 are related to an isolated set of massive modes of the compactification and so, in a spirit similar to [62], we will demand that the set of representatives {ω tor r−1 } should be closed under the action of the Laplacian, as in eq. (4.18).…”
Section: Massive Rr U(1)'s From Torsionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this looks physically very reasonable, KK reducing on a general manifold is in fact not easy, in general: so far, the only examples fully understood are Calabi-Yau's, parallelizable manifolds (like the so-called "twisted tori", used in ScherkSchwarz constructions 3 ) or cosets. Proposals exist on how to understand more general manifolds (see for example [27]), but they are plagued by many geometrical issues [28], which so far seem to be under control only in simple cases [20,29] (although one can show that four-and ten-dimensional supersymmetry are equivalent [30,31]). Given this state of affairs, one might want to look for vacua first, and only later for effective theories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%