2006
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jam.2240208
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards reliable efficient frontiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption establishes the upper bound for B h,h+j . In particular, for the specific case of j → ∞, Σ −1 h+j µ h+j → Σ −1 µ, and in turn B h,h+j = θ < B h,h ; see Schottle and Werner (2006).…”
Section: A Characterizing the Multiperiod Utility Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption establishes the upper bound for B h,h+j . In particular, for the specific case of j → ∞, Σ −1 h+j µ h+j → Σ −1 µ, and in turn B h,h+j = θ < B h,h ; see Schottle and Werner (2006).…”
Section: A Characterizing the Multiperiod Utility Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rationale is that the shape of classical mean-variance frontier (MVF) and the location of efficient portfolios change drastically across multiple regimes (Sch¨ottle and Werner, 2006). The investors at this point may use dynamic strategies by systematically adjusting allocations according to the state-dependent mean variance frontiers.…”
Section: Factor Regimesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption establishes the upper bound for B h,h+j . In particular, for the specific case of j → ∞, Σ −1 h+j μ h+j → Σ −1 μ, and in turn B h,h+j = θ < B h,h (see Schottle and Werner (2006)). …”
Section: Characterizing the Multiperiod Utility Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%