2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.105278
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards resolving the co-existing impacts of multiple dynamic factors on the performance of EMG-pattern recognition based prostheses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In similar trends with other results, the multi-features outperformed the single features when 2-channels, 4-channels and 6-channels were considered. Finally, by critically analyzing of our results, we discovered that when classification error, computation time, and number of electrodes were considered together, most feature sets achieved good classification performance with optimal windowing parameters of 250 ms/100 ms. Also, discoveries from this study through the systematic approach adopted can facilitate positive development in other areas where optimal features and machine learning driven approaches are required [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. Last, one limitation of the current work is that the EMG pattern recognition system for movement intent decoding was analyzed in an off-line mode, and we hope to conduct online and real-time analysis in our future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In similar trends with other results, the multi-features outperformed the single features when 2-channels, 4-channels and 6-channels were considered. Finally, by critically analyzing of our results, we discovered that when classification error, computation time, and number of electrodes were considered together, most feature sets achieved good classification performance with optimal windowing parameters of 250 ms/100 ms. Also, discoveries from this study through the systematic approach adopted can facilitate positive development in other areas where optimal features and machine learning driven approaches are required [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. Last, one limitation of the current work is that the EMG pattern recognition system for movement intent decoding was analyzed in an off-line mode, and we hope to conduct online and real-time analysis in our future work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extension towards an Adaptive Control Framework Due to factors mentioned in Section 1, external factors could make redundant trained class boundaries, and as a result, cause classifier degradation; this warrants the need for classifier relearning to adapt to the dynamic changes which may be causing performance degradation [4]. Researchers in this area, such as Samuel et al, Chen et al, and Asogbon et al [12][13][14], have proposed extensions to various classifier architectures to allow online adaptation of classifier decision boundaries, as necessary [4]. Here, we propose an extension of the presented self-learning control framework as a means of an adaptive framework for cluster decision cluster reformation with real-time data from current anatomical and acquisition electronic states.…”
Section: Intent Decodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, higher DOFs can be achieved for upper-limb prostheses [9]. However, certain critical factors affect the EMG-PR performance, including variation in the muscle contraction force [10]- [13], electrode position shift [14]- [16], hand orientation [17], [18], limb position [17], [19], [20] and nonstationarity of the EMG signal [21]. Among these factors, the variation in the muscle contraction force for a specific gesture occurs frequently in our daily activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%