Towards seamless computing and metacomputing in Java

Caromel, Denis; Klauser, Wilfried; Vayssière, Julien

doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9128(199809/11)10:11/13<1043::aid-cpe413>3.0.co;2-6

Cited by 106 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Java// (ProActive) [2] is a 100% Java library for seamless crossparadigm high performance computing. Both environments are targeted towards high performance computing in pure Java.…”

Section: Fig 3 Results Of the Performance Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Service-Based Agent Framework for Distributed Symbolic Computation

Schimkat

Blochinger

Sinz

et al. 2000

High Performance Computing and Networking

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. We present OKEANOS, a distributed service-based agent framework implemented in Java, in which agents can act autonomously and make use of stationary services. Each agent's behaviour can be controlled individually by a rule-based knowledge component, and cooperation between agents is supported through the exchange of messages at common meeting points (agent lounges). We suggest this general scheme as a new parallelization paradigm for Symbolic Computation, and demonstrate its applicability by an agent-based parallel implementation of a satisfiability (SAT) checker.

show abstract

“…Java// (ProActive) [2] is a 100% Java library for seamless crossparadigm high performance computing. Both environments are targeted towards high performance computing in pure Java.…”

Section: Fig 3 Results Of the Performance Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Service-Based Agent Framework for Distributed Symbolic Computation

Schimkat

Blochinger

Sinz

et al. 2000

High Performance Computing and Networking

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They utilize special entities in the language itself or OS to implement concurrent computing, such as Thread class in Java and process or thread in Windows OS. Other research has shown how to implement active objects using normal OOPLs to benefit concurrent programming [CKV98,LS96]. In [LS96], active object is a behavioral pattern with multiple participants, such as Proxy, Scheduler, Servant etc.…”

Section: A Class May Be Designated As Active (Ie Each Of Its Instamentioning

confidence: 99%

Thread–Based Analysis of Sequence Diagrams

Dan

Hierons

Counsell

2007

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Sequence Diagrams (SDs) offer an intuitive and visual way of describing expected behaviour of Object Oriented (OO) software. They focus on modelling the method calls among participants of a software system at runtime. This is an essential difference from its ancestor, basic Message Sequence Charts (bMSCs), which are mainly used to model the exchange of asynchronous messages. Since method calls are regarded as synchronous messages in the Unified Modelling Language (UML) Version 2.0, synchronous messages play a significantly more important role in SDs than in bMSCs. However, the effect of this difference has not been fully explored in previous work on the semantics of SDs. One important aim of this paper is to identify the differences between SDs and bMSCs. We observe that using traditional semantics to interpret SDs may not interpret SDs correct under certain circumstances. Consequently, we propose a new method to interpret SDs which uses thread tags to deal with identified problems.

show abstract

“…Just like VM-based runtime-MOPs, Proxy-based runtime MOPs such as RJava [9] or ProActive [5], reify things that only exist at runtime, like object creation or method calls. The difference is that proxy-based runtime-MOPs are targeted at the standard Java runtime environment and do not rely on a specialized VM.…”

Section: Proxy-based Runtime Mopsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Reflections on MOP s, Components, and Java Security

Caromel¹,

Vayssière²

2001

ECOOP 2001 — Object-Oriented Programming

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. This article investigates the security issues raised by the use of meta-programming systems with Java. For each possible type of MOP (compile-time, load-time, etc.), we study the permissions required for both the base and the meta-level protection domains, taking into account the flow of control between the different parts of the application. We show that the choice of a particular MOP architecture has a strong impact on security issues. Assuming a component-based architecture with code from various origins having different levels of trust, we establish a set of rules for combining the permissions associated with each protection domain (integration, base-level, meta-level, etc.).

show abstract

Towards seamless computing and metacomputing in Java

Cited by 106 publications

References 10 publications

A Service-Based Agent Framework for Distributed Symbolic Computation

A Service-Based Agent Framework for Distributed Symbolic Computation

Thread–Based Analysis of Sequence Diagrams

Reflections on MOP s, Components, and Java Security

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About