2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-50120-4_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Segmentation and Spatial Alignment of the Human Embryonic Brain Using Deep Learning for Atlas-Based Registration

Abstract: We propose an unsupervised deep learning method for atlasbased registration to achieve segmentation and spatial alignment of the embryonic brain in a single framework. Our approach consists of two sequential networks with a specifically designed loss function to address the challenges in 3D first trimester ultrasound. The first part learns the affine transformation and the second part learns the voxelwise nonrigid deformation between the target image and the atlas. We trained this network end-to-end and valida… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MI is used as the loss function. However, VoxelMorph consistently under-performed in our rigid registration task (similar is also observed by [62]) and we decided to not include the related results, for clarity.…”
Section: Voxelmorphmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MI is used as the loss function. However, VoxelMorph consistently under-performed in our rigid registration task (similar is also observed by [62]) and we decided to not include the related results, for clarity.…”
Section: Voxelmorphmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…For sake of visual clarity we therefore omit the latter from the graph. As already commented, we also exclude results obtained by VoxelMorph [35] due to its demonstrated consistently poor performance, which we attribute to the constraint of rigid registration (as also observed by [62]). In Table 2, we summarise the aggregated performance, over all the considered displacements.…”
Section: Registration Performancementioning
confidence: 81%
“…Firstly, note that our framework consists of two networks, one dedicated to learning an affine transformation and the other to learning a nonrigid deformation. In previous work we showed that separating these tasks was needed due to the wide variety in positions and orientation of the embryo (Bastiaansen et al, 2020a). Therefore, the deformation φ consists of an affine transformation φ a and a nonrigid deformation φ d , such that:…”
Section: Learning To Estimate the Deformation φmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 10). When objects in the background are present, penalizing extreme zooming is beneficial, as was showed in Bastiaansen et al (2020a). Hence, L scaling is defined as:…”
Section: Loss Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A popular combination strategy is to Email address: b.li@erasmusmc.nl (Bo Li) Abbreviations: MRI, Magnetic Resonance Imaging; DTI, Diffusion Tensor Imaging; FA, Fractional Anisotropy; MD, Mean Diffusivity; TE, Echo Time; TR, Repetition Time use the output of one task to optimize the other. Registration can be improved by using segmentation-level correspondences as input for deformation initialization (Dai and Khorram, 1999;Postelnicu et al, 2008) and optimization (De Groot et al, 2013b;Rohé et al, 2017;Hu et al, 2018;Balakrishnan et al, 2019;Bastiaansen et al, 2020;Zhu et al, 2020). Likewise, segmentation can benefit from registration by propagating anatomical information to subsequent frames, as has been shown in classical multi-atlas based segmentation methods (Fischl et al, 2002;Vakalopoulou et al, 2018) and in recent data-augmentation techniques which introduce labels to support unsupervised (Pathak et al, 2017) and weakly-supervised segmentation (Bortsova et al, 2019;Vlontzos and Mikolajczyk, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%