2009 Sixth International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks 2009
DOI: 10.1109/bsn.2009.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Self-Healing in Wireless Sensor Networks

Abstract: Abstract-Faults in WSN are very common and appear in different levels of the system. For pervasive applications to be adopted by end-users there is a need for autonomic selfhealing. This paper discusses our initial approach to selfhealing in WSN and describes experiments with two case studies of body sensor deployment. We evaluate the impact of sensor faults on activity and gesture classification accuracy respectively and develop mechanisms that will allow detection of those faults during system's operation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [22] a self-healing framework(primarily for Wireless Sensor Networks), which enables a flexible choice of components for detection and masking of faults as well as reconfiguration of the network is proposed. Here the correlation feature between two pairs of sensor signals is used as a metric for fault detection.…”
Section: Related Work On Models and Architectures Of Self-healingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [22] a self-healing framework(primarily for Wireless Sensor Networks), which enables a flexible choice of components for detection and masking of faults as well as reconfiguration of the network is proposed. Here the correlation feature between two pairs of sensor signals is used as a metric for fault detection.…”
Section: Related Work On Models and Architectures Of Self-healingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al. specify policies as Java classes in the Prism-MX platform [22]; IRIDIUM adaptation policies map faulttree-like rules to an action, at a configurable evaluation rate [27]; Starfish provides a policy language that supports event-condition-actions as well as authorization (which Stitch does not have) [31]; Vogel and Giese's modeldriven approach specifies adaptation policies in terms of model transformation rules [32]; although versatile and powerful, these policy mechanisms lack support for timing and uncertainty, and make it difficult to specify impact on quality-of-service and, thus, to resolve conflicts as well as to make QoSbased choice of the best adaptation. PBAAM [33] and StarMX [28] specify policies as expert system rules, which supports notions of uncertainty, but does not inherently support QoS evaluation, conflict resolution, and settling time.…”
Section: Languages For Specifying Adaptation Policiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Starfish framework [10] supports development of adaptive, autonomous applications for power constrained, embedded devices running the TinyOS 2.x operating system. It is a realisation of the Self-Managed Cell (SMC) architecture [9] that incorporates the basic building blocks to form federations of autonomous components that compose to large-scale autonomic systems.…”
Section: Starfish Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%