2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.02.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards shock-stable and accurate hypersonic heating computations: A new pressure flux for AUSM-family schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
95
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The convective flux was discretized with AUSM + -up scheme [7] because this scheme seems to be the best for hypersonic gas dynamics [8,9]. Due to carbuncle phenomenon, the convective flux was discretized with the original AUSM + -up scheme [7], which is a first order upwind scheme.…”
Section: Numerical Simulations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The convective flux was discretized with AUSM + -up scheme [7] because this scheme seems to be the best for hypersonic gas dynamics [8,9]. Due to carbuncle phenomenon, the convective flux was discretized with the original AUSM + -up scheme [7], which is a first order upwind scheme.…”
Section: Numerical Simulations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the flow properties are set at the center of a control volume. Then, the advection fluxes in the N-S equations are calculated using the SLAU2 scheme [49] along with the MUSCL interpolation method for high accuracy. The viscous fluxes are evaluated using the second-order central difference method.…”
Section: Numerical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tests allow to assess the role of the inertia term in the face velocity definition, and to compare the performance with other schemes: AUSM + [10], AUSM + -up [11], SLAU [4,21], 'JCAM 2013' [14], and the momentum interpolation [15,16] (these schemes are described in Appendix A).…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%