Towards standard metadata to support models and interfaces in a hydro-meteorological model chain

Abstract

This paper seeks to move towards an un-encoded metadata standard supporting the description of environmental numerical models and their interfaces with other such models. Building on formal metadata standards and supported by the local standards applied by modelling frameworks, the desire is to produce a solution, which is as simple as possible yet meets the requirements to support model coupling processes. The purpose of this metadata is to allow environmental numerical models, with a first application for a hydro-meteorological model chain, to be discovered and then an initial evaluation made of their suitability for use, in particular for integrated model compositions. The method applied is to begin with the ISO19115 standard and add extensions suitable for environmental numerical models in general. Further extensions are considered pertaining to model interface parameters (or phenomena) together with spatial and temporal characteristics supported by feature types from climate science modelling language. Successful validation of parameters depends heavily on the existence of controlled vocabularies. The metadata structure formulated has been designed to strike the right balance between simplicity and supporting the purposes drawn out by interfacing the Real-time Interactive Basin Simulator hydrological model to meteorological and hydraulic models and, as such, successfully provides an initial level of information to the user.Quillon Harpham (corresponding author) HR Wallingford,

Using OpenMI and a Model MAP to Integrate WaterML2 and NetCDF Data Sources into Flood Modeling of Genoa, Italy

“…Each model provided on DRIHM is accompanied by a metadata record, an extended ISO19139 dataset (Harpham and Danovaro, ) and stored in an accompanying catalog (DRIHM Model Catalogue, ).…”

Lessons learned implementing a science gateway for hydro‐meteorological research

“…We started from the ISO19115 metadata standard for describing spatial datasets and adopted an extension described in [13]. To grant consistency, we rely on two complementary techniques: unified storage of experiment parameters among model UIs, so that the generated configurations (usually as textual namelists) are shared among models and coherent; and metadata describing experiment steps, the associated model, the required input files and the expected outputs, file format and some constraints on the geographical domain, and the time frame described by the outputs.…”

Setting Up an Hydro-Meteo Experiment in Minutes: The DRIHM e-Infrastructure for HM Research

“…This allows to provide general information (such as a title, an abstract, owning organization or contact details, execution platform, link to sources or binaries) but also, for each input and output: Name, Description, Format, whether it is mandatory. In [19] we further extended the set of metadata by: File full pathname of the input/output file (if any). Feature Type a description of the spatial / temporal structure of the data, such as PointSeries, GridSeries, .…”