1993
DOI: 10.1109/51.232341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards statistically optimal interpolation for 3D medical imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Trilinear interpolation is considered the gold standard for calculating DRRs (Galwin 1995, McGee et al 1995. More expensive non-linear interpolation schemes have been studied (Maeland 1988, Grevera & Udupa 1998, Parrot et al 1993, Joliot & Mazoyer 1993, Grevera & Udupa 1996, but have not yet replaced tri-linear interpolation in clinical visualization nor received much attention in medical volume visualization research.…”
Section: Verification Visualization For Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Trilinear interpolation is considered the gold standard for calculating DRRs (Galwin 1995, McGee et al 1995. More expensive non-linear interpolation schemes have been studied (Maeland 1988, Grevera & Udupa 1998, Parrot et al 1993, Joliot & Mazoyer 1993, Grevera & Udupa 1996, but have not yet replaced tri-linear interpolation in clinical visualization nor received much attention in medical volume visualization research.…”
Section: Verification Visualization For Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parrot and coworkers compared different interpolation algorithms for MR image reformatting, and, continued by Metchik and coworkers, found kriging to be the best interpolation tool for 3d MR image data (Parrot et al 1993, Metchik et al 1994. Kriging uses a variogram, the correlation intensity as a function of distance, to calculate the interpolation weights.…”
Section: Preprocessing Of Magnetic Resonance Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we resort to the MM approach [30] as it is easy to comprehend: The idea, as described in [30], is to replace the original difficult task by several easy-to-optimize problems that will guarantee a monotonic decrease of the original cost. We briefly review from [30] the mathematical details underlying the MM philosophy in Section IV-B.1 and then apply it to the following two instances of convex nonquadratic cost 3 .…”
Section: B Nonquadratic Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that distant samples lose importance and eventually can be ignored in the estimator while closer samples, which are more likely to be part of the same body and to have similar realization values, increase their relative importance. Its application to the interpolation of 3D scalar medical images has been referred elsewhere [9]. Here the method is used in the interpolation of displacement fields considering each spatial component independently.…”
Section: Interpolation: the Kriging Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substituting them into (8) and making some manipulations its possible to derive the well-known correlation coefficient similarity measure (9), whose absolute value is to be maximized and where…”
Section: Similarity Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%