Proceedings of the 20th European MPI Users' Group Meeting 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2488551.2488599
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards the availability of Java bindings in open MPI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DA-MDS implementation in SPIDAL Java, for example, has two call sites to MPI allgatherv collective, BC-Comm and MMComm, written using OpenMPI Java binding [23]. They both communicate an identical number of data elements, except one routine is called more times than the other.…”
Section: Technical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DA-MDS implementation in SPIDAL Java, for example, has two call sites to MPI allgatherv collective, BC-Comm and MMComm, written using OpenMPI Java binding [23]. They both communicate an identical number of data elements, except one routine is called more times than the other.…”
Section: Technical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to facilitate writing parallel Java code for shared memory systems, Java is equipped with a feature-rich threading API. In order to teach programming distributed memory systems, we had the option to choose between various Java MPI libraries including MPJ Express [5], FastMPJ [7], and Open MPI Java [8]. In this context, we choose MPJ Express that is being developed and maintained at NUST Pakistan.…”
Section: Motivation For Using Javamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of JNI ensures the minimum added overhead to the performance of native MPI functions. The maintenance complexity pertained to the first-generation MPI bindings for Java, as discussed by [1], is minimized by a tight integration with the native build system of the MPI library, as presented by [10]. In terms of the functional possibilities, MPI stays ahead of all other alternatives.…”
Section: Pros and Cons Analysis For Use With Hpcsmentioning
confidence: 99%