2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.image.2017.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards the design of a consistent image contrast enhancement evaluation measure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A higher RE value means a better edge restoration. Finally, in order to measure the global image contrast, we proposed to use Mutual Information based Contrast Measure (MICM) recommended in [ 46 ]. A lower MICM value indicates higher and better contrast in the images.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A higher RE value means a better edge restoration. Finally, in order to measure the global image contrast, we proposed to use Mutual Information based Contrast Measure (MICM) recommended in [ 46 ]. A lower MICM value indicates higher and better contrast in the images.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…c RE [ 45 ]. d MICM [ 46 ]. Note that, for the JNBM, only 500 frames are plotted to provide better illustration …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the subjective testing, we have used pairwise-comparison protocol. 12,13 For each observer, we randomly displayed all possible pair combinations of distorted videos, such that each pair had two videos from the same category and the same distortion type, with only difference being the severity level. This corresponded to 6 pair-wise comparisons per reference video for each distortion type.…”
Section: Subjective Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the four IQA techniques used in the dataset labeling step, two more were used to evaluate the similarity between the ideal (original) and obtained (contrast enhanced) images: absolute mean brightness error (AMBE) [70] and visual information fidelity (VIF) [71]. According to [72], most of the existing contrast enhancement evaluation measures are not related to human perception of enhancement quality. Thus, we selected AMBE and VIF due to being full-reference techniques and exhibiting positive correlations with perceptual quality of contrast enhancement.…”
Section: Full-reference Image Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%