2010
DOI: 10.3390/molecules15118289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards the Development of Synthetic Routes Using Theoretical Calculations: An Application of In Silico Screening to 2,6-Dimethylchroman-4-one

Abstract: This study describes an attempt to develop a synthetic route using theoretical calculations, i.e., in silico synthesis route development. The KOSP program created four potential synthetic routes for generating 2,6-dimethylchroman-4-one. In silico screening of these four synthetic routes was then performed. In silico screening involves theoretical analysis of synthetic routes prior to actual experimental work. A synthetic route using the Mitsunobu reaction had already been reported by Hoddgets et al. Theoretica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computational tools have been developed over the past four decades to help the synthetic chemists (and/or their CADD colleagues) find a viable synthetic route for a novel molecule. They can be broadly categorized into two classes: synthesizability estimation [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] ; and synthetic route prediction (variously called computer assisted synthesis design (CASD), computer-assisted organic synthesis (CAOS), computer-assisted synthesis planning (CASP), or computer-assisted reaction design (CARD)) [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] . These tools had their heyday during the 1980s and 1990s but subsequently fell out of favor as an approach used in practice, and the entire field went essentially dormant for a good decade until the field experienced a revival of sorts in the 2010s.…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational tools have been developed over the past four decades to help the synthetic chemists (and/or their CADD colleagues) find a viable synthetic route for a novel molecule. They can be broadly categorized into two classes: synthesizability estimation [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] ; and synthetic route prediction (variously called computer assisted synthesis design (CASD), computer-assisted organic synthesis (CAOS), computer-assisted synthesis planning (CASP), or computer-assisted reaction design (CARD)) [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] . These tools had their heyday during the 1980s and 1990s but subsequently fell out of favor as an approach used in practice, and the entire field went essentially dormant for a good decade until the field experienced a revival of sorts in the 2010s.…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational tools have been developed over the past four decades to alleviate these issues and help the synthetic chemist (and/or their CADD colleague) find a viable synthetic route for a novel molecule. They can be broadly categorized into two classes: synthesizability estimation [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] ; and synthetic route prediction (variously called computer assisted synthesis design (CASD), computer-assisted organic synthesis (CAOS), computer-assisted synthesis planning (CASP), computer-assisted reaction design (CARD), and yet other terms) [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] . While the former is often based on statistical, QSAR-like approaches and used (only) in the context of in silico screening, the latter typically apply some kind of retrosynthetic reasoning and were meant to support the bench chemist.…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational tools have been developed over the past four decades to alleviate these issues and help the synthetic chemist (and/or their CADD colleague) find a viable synthetic route for a novel molecule. They can be broadly categorized into two classes: synthesizability estimation [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] ; and synthetic route prediction (variously called computer assisted synthesis design (CASD), computer-assisted organic synthesis (CAOS), computer-assisted synthesis planning (CASP), computer-assisted reaction design (CARD), and yet other terms) [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] . While the former is often based on statistical, QSAR-like approaches and used (only) in the context of in silico screening, the latter typically apply some kind of retrosynthetic reasoning and were meant to support the bench chemist.…”
Section: Background and Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%