2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2006.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards the estimation of equilibrium exchange rates for transition economies: Methodological issues and a panel cointegration perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
71
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the computed real misalignment should be viewed as a medium-to long-term deviation. Outof-sample data 7 may include either a group of developed countries (e.g., Kim and Korhonen, 2002;Maeso-Fernandez et al, 2004;É gert et al, 2004b) or possibly all (market) economies in the world (e.g., Halpern and Wyplosz, 1997;Krajnyák and Zettelmeyer, 1998). Using out-of-sample data including developing countries implies that the equilibrium exchange rate of transition economies behaves like that in developed countries (with which transition economies are making an effort to catch up in 5 It is always convenient to code the alternative approaches relative to the one with most of the observations.…”
Section: Estimation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the computed real misalignment should be viewed as a medium-to long-term deviation. Outof-sample data 7 may include either a group of developed countries (e.g., Kim and Korhonen, 2002;Maeso-Fernandez et al, 2004;É gert et al, 2004b) or possibly all (market) economies in the world (e.g., Halpern and Wyplosz, 1997;Krajnyák and Zettelmeyer, 1998). Using out-of-sample data including developing countries implies that the equilibrium exchange rate of transition economies behaves like that in developed countries (with which transition economies are making an effort to catch up in 5 It is always convenient to code the alternative approaches relative to the one with most of the observations.…”
Section: Estimation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is important given no single equilibrium exchange rate approach is problem free. A range of different econometric techniques, but based on one major theoretical approach, are employed in Crespo-Cuaresma, Fidrmuc and MacDonald (2005), and Maeso-Fernandez, Osbat and Schnatz (2004). Yet, we lack, at present, a comprehensive study, which explores all dimensions (theoretical, econometric, time series vs. panel) of the assessment of equilibrium exchange rates for transition, developing and fully developed economies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the approach by Chudik and Mongardini (2007) and Maeso-Fernandez et al (2004), we did the same estimation by using dynamic heterogeneous panel methods from an Error Correction Model setup.…”
Section: Annex 2: the Dynamic Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%