2018
DOI: 10.1080/15980316.2018.1498810
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards the fluorescence retention and colloidal stability of InP quantum dots through surface treatment with zirconium propoxide

Abstract: Through the synthetic development of sophisticated core/shell heterostructures, the fluorescent properties of quantum dots (QDs) have been steadily improved to a level that can ultimately meet the industrial demands, but their reliability is still insufficient, particularly showing low fluorescence stability against degradable conditions. As one solution to this issue, an additional physical barrier typically with an oxide phase has been introduced to protect the QD surface from the environment. In this work, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting green (530 nm) QDs exhibited a PL line width of 50 nm and a PL QY of 82% (Figure S2a). These PL figures of merit are the best values as compared to the earlier reports on non-(TMS) 3 P-derived InP QDs. , Such a high PL QY was attributable to the proper insertion of a ZnSeS inner shell that effectively mitigates a large interfacial lattice strain associated with the substantial lattice mismatch (7.7%) between core InP and outer shell ZnS. In the case of conventional single-shelled InP/ZnS QDs, their sizes typically do not exceed 5–6 nm. Such relatively small sizes point to the difficulty of thick ZnS epitaxial growth, again due to a large InP–ZnS lattice mismatch. , On the other hand, sizes of the present InP/ZnSeS/ZnS QDs were quite big (an average diameter of 8.3 nm), (Figure S2b,c), as the inner shell ZnSeS has a moderate disparity in lattice constant with core InP, which is expected to allow for a much thicker epitaxial growth. Nonetheless, these one-pot heterostructured InP QDs possessed a much broader PL fwhm (full width at half-maximum) compared to state-of-the-art (TMS) 3 P-derived counterparts (i.e., 35–36 nm for green emitters). , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The resulting green (530 nm) QDs exhibited a PL line width of 50 nm and a PL QY of 82% (Figure S2a). These PL figures of merit are the best values as compared to the earlier reports on non-(TMS) 3 P-derived InP QDs. , Such a high PL QY was attributable to the proper insertion of a ZnSeS inner shell that effectively mitigates a large interfacial lattice strain associated with the substantial lattice mismatch (7.7%) between core InP and outer shell ZnS. In the case of conventional single-shelled InP/ZnS QDs, their sizes typically do not exceed 5–6 nm. Such relatively small sizes point to the difficulty of thick ZnS epitaxial growth, again due to a large InP–ZnS lattice mismatch. , On the other hand, sizes of the present InP/ZnSeS/ZnS QDs were quite big (an average diameter of 8.3 nm), (Figure S2b,c), as the inner shell ZnSeS has a moderate disparity in lattice constant with core InP, which is expected to allow for a much thicker epitaxial growth. Nonetheless, these one-pot heterostructured InP QDs possessed a much broader PL fwhm (full width at half-maximum) compared to state-of-the-art (TMS) 3 P-derived counterparts (i.e., 35–36 nm for green emitters). , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, (DMA) 3 P-derived InP QDs appear to still lag behind in PL QY and line width compared to the aforementioned state-of-the-art (TMS) 3 P-based counterparts. The highest PL QYs of (DMA) 3 P-derived InP QDs after the introduction of ZnSeS/ZnS double shells were 78 and 80% for green and red color, respectively; however, their PL line widths were quite broad, i.e., 52 (green) and 63 nm (red). Meanwhile, the narrowest line width of 48 nm among (DMA) 3 P-based syntheses was reported from red InP/ZnSe QDs, where ZnSe as a shell was considered to be ideal in alleviating core/shell lattice mismatch accompanying the additional heterogeneous line broadening; however, this single ZnSe shelling sacrificed the PL QY (50%) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If the market saturation is inevitable for the existing products (such as “traditional” phones and TVs), the electronic healthcare can be an interesting area to look at that may open the door to tremendous future opportunities. In this regard, emerging display technologies (eg, quantum dot/perovskite LEDs, micro‐LEDs, transaparent backplanes, etc) may provide one day a greater versatility and performance specifically well suited for bio applications, while their research activity is still not comparable with that of OLEDs (see as an example the QLED graph overlay in Figure A).…”
Section: The Crosspointmentioning
confidence: 99%