2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2110.01589
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards the Simulation of Large Scale Protein-Ligand Interactions on NISQ-era Quantum Computers

Abstract: We explore the use of symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (SAPT) as a simple and efficient means to compute interaction energies between large molecular systems with a hybrid method combing NISQ-era quantum and classical computers. From the one-and two-particle reduced density matrices of the monomer wavefunctions obtained by the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE), we compute SAPT contributions to the interaction energy [SAPT(VQE)]. At first order, this energy yields the electrostatic and exchange contribu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach differs significantly from that of Malone et al [24], who also used quantum computation to estimate protein-ligand binding energies. Their simulations were, however, performed on a classical quantum emulator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our approach differs significantly from that of Malone et al [24], who also used quantum computation to estimate protein-ligand binding energies. Their simulations were, however, performed on a classical quantum emulator.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) quantum simulations of 6 small molecules and a subsection of the KDM5A protein were performed on a state-vector emulator to estimate their 1and 2-electron reduced density matrices, which were then employed in a classical SAPT (1) calculation. However computed interaction energies did not reproduce ligand rankings yielded by more accurate 2 nd order SAPT calculations, due to the missing induction and dispersion components in the 1 st order approximation [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could be as simple as ensuring that basis sets are sufficiently saturated [86], or that the complexity of the interactions with a wider system were sufficiently resolved. For instance, consider computing the energy of a series of protein-ligand complexes (for which methods extending VQE have already been proposed [121,122]): even if the VQE achieves better accuracy in lower computation time, it is not guaranteed that these accuracy gains lead to a practical advantage. For example, the accuracy gains may still be insufficient to predict the most appropriate ligand in a physical experiment due to the approximations in the treatment of the environment in the Hamiltonian.…”
Section: Advantage Argument Assumptions and Limitations Of The Vqementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This covers highly diverse applications such as the description of heterogeneous processes on surfaces including catalysis [29], observation of phase transitions, such as nucleation processes for water [30], and maybe of highest importance for pharmaceutical research, the interaction of drugs with their targets in the human body [31]. By free energy calculations based on MD simulations, these interactions can be quantified, allowing the prediction of compound affinities [32,33], which are eventually linked to therapeutic doses. Beyond that, MD simulations of drug-target systems enable the observation of conformational changes of the target.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%