2020
DOI: 10.1007/jhep09(2020)170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards the ultimate differential SMEFT analysis

Abstract: We obtain SMEFT bounds using an approach that utilises the complete multi-dimensional differential information of a process. This approach is based on the fact that at a given EFT order, the full angular distribution in the most important electroweak processes can be expressed as a sum of a fixed number of basis functions. The coefficients of these basis functions — the so-called angular moments — and their energy dependance, thus form an ideal set of experimental observables that encapsulates the complete mul… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
(132 reference statements)
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…riety of studies of the SMEFT, for example, in electroweak processes [106][107][108][109][110][111], flavour physics [112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120], low-energy precision data [121][122][123], diboson measurements [124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131], at dimension 8 [87,88,[132][133][134][135][136] (where collider positivity constraints are particularly relevant [136][137][138][139][140]), and its connection with UV-complete models, both at tree-level [141][142][143][144][145][146][147] and one-loop [148][149][150]…”
Section: Jhep04(2021)279mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…riety of studies of the SMEFT, for example, in electroweak processes [106][107][108][109][110][111], flavour physics [112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120], low-energy precision data [121][122][123], diboson measurements [124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131], at dimension 8 [87,88,[132][133][134][135][136] (where collider positivity constraints are particularly relevant [136][137][138][139][140]), and its connection with UV-complete models, both at tree-level [141][142][143][144][145][146][147] and one-loop [148][149][150]…”
Section: Jhep04(2021)279mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work can be seen as a continuation of ref. [51] where the method of moments was used to obtain the strongest reported projections for the measurement of the gauge-Higgs couplings in the Higgstrahlung processes, pp → W h/Zh. In this work we will finally combine the projections from the h → 4 channel with the results from ref.…”
Section: Jhep06(2021)031mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work we will finally combine the projections from the h → 4 channel with the results from ref. [51] for the pp → W h/Zh process. As we will see, these processes probe complimentary directions in the EFT space so that their combination results in highly stringent bounds on the EFT deformations of the Higgs coupling to gauge bosons.…”
Section: Jhep06(2021)031mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hadron colliders have the advantage of probing a large range of energies, thus allowing us to test the high-energy tails of kinematic distributions, where new physics is more easily accessible. The exploitation of selected "clean" processes with small statistical and systematic uncertainty is key for this kind of precision studies, especially when they target the EW dynamics [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Jhep04(2021)154mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main limiting factors in carrying on the EW precision program at the LHC is the limited amount of events in many clean channels, which forces one to focus only on final states with high cross-section. Some of the best probes for new physics come from processes involving gauge bosons and/or the Higgs, most notably the di-boson production channels [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. These processes are sensitive to many operators that describe the couplings of the SM gauge bosons and the high-energy dynamics of the Higgs.…”
Section: Jhep04(2021)154mentioning
confidence: 99%