2022
DOI: 10.1177/00220345221106086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Trustworthy AI in Dentistry

Abstract: Medical and dental artificial intelligence (AI) require the trust of both users and recipients of the AI to enhance implementation, acceptability, reach, and maintenance. Standardization is one strategy to generate such trust, with quality standards pushing for improvements in AI and reliable quality in a number of attributes. In the present brief review, we summarize ongoing activities from research and standardization that contribute to the trustworthiness of medical and, specifically, dental AI and discuss … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we see future efforts advancing beyond the methodological limitations of this work by establishing consistent benchmarks and widely accepted systematic annotation schemes, as already suggested in Ma et al (2022) . In addition, with the recent development of generative modeling in computer vision ( Pang et al 2021 ), we like to highlight the potential of infusing OPG images with 3-dimensional information, enabling a highly robust and fine-grained estimation of the relationship between the M3M and the IAN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, we see future efforts advancing beyond the methodological limitations of this work by establishing consistent benchmarks and widely accepted systematic annotation schemes, as already suggested in Ma et al (2022) . In addition, with the recent development of generative modeling in computer vision ( Pang et al 2021 ), we like to highlight the potential of infusing OPG images with 3-dimensional information, enabling a highly robust and fine-grained estimation of the relationship between the M3M and the IAN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Our proposed evaluation strategy was developed to identify and correct overly optimistic model performance both through robust evaluation metrics that are resilient to unbalanced label distribution and through an external validation data set that could potentially detect assimilated shortcut features. As highlighted in the medical imaging domain ( Shehab et al 2022 ), and in particular in the field of dentistry ( Schwendicke et al 2020 ; Ma et al 2022 ), such benchmarking proved essential for trustworthy machine learning. As expected, we observed an overall drop in all model performances when models were evaluated by in-distribution cross-validation in comparison to the out-of-distribution control data set.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These issues are particularly prevalent in LMICs. This lack of transparency raises questions about the quality and reliability of the datasets, which are critical for development and validation of AI algorithms in dentistry [ 3 , 36 , 45 ]. Therefore, it is important for researchers in LMICs to focus on sourcing high-quality, representative datasets, curation, and annotation methods to improve the development and validation of AI algorithms in dentistry, even though it be challenging and time-consuming in a resource-limited setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational methods such as artificial intelligence and machine learning are emerging in oral health care to solve these diagnostic and prognostic challenges [ 9 ]. Machine learning, which is a subset of artificial intelligence, refers to computationally intensive methods that use data-driven approaches to develop models that require fewer modeling decisions by the modeler than traditional modeling techniques [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%