2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcns.2022.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards understanding, estimating and mitigating higher-mode effects for more resilient tall buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As demonstrated by the results of the shaking table tests, relying on a single inelastic flexural mechanism at the base of a cantilever structure is ineffective in limiting the seismic demands, especially the shear force demands at the base and along the height of the structure. Although ongoing research on higher‐mode effects has yielded many analytical equations that aim to capture the higher‐mode‐induced shear force amplification in the design process, 2–14 a broadly applicable methodology is not available yet to accurately account for the shear force amplification and changes in the shear force distribution along the height of structures due to higher‐mode effects 2,3 . As summarized in Christopoulos and Zhong, 3 most methods presented in codes and standards were based on early research on this topic that accounted for higher‐mode effects using a single amplification factor, based on the number of stories or the fundamental period of the structure under consideration, to amplify the story shear envelopes calculated by the code‐prescribed Equivalent Static Force Procedure (ESFP) or Response Spectrum Analysis (RSA) 58–61 .…”
Section: Challenges In Predicting Shear Amplifications Due To Higher‐...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…As demonstrated by the results of the shaking table tests, relying on a single inelastic flexural mechanism at the base of a cantilever structure is ineffective in limiting the seismic demands, especially the shear force demands at the base and along the height of the structure. Although ongoing research on higher‐mode effects has yielded many analytical equations that aim to capture the higher‐mode‐induced shear force amplification in the design process, 2–14 a broadly applicable methodology is not available yet to accurately account for the shear force amplification and changes in the shear force distribution along the height of structures due to higher‐mode effects 2,3 . As summarized in Christopoulos and Zhong, 3 most methods presented in codes and standards were based on early research on this topic that accounted for higher‐mode effects using a single amplification factor, based on the number of stories or the fundamental period of the structure under consideration, to amplify the story shear envelopes calculated by the code‐prescribed Equivalent Static Force Procedure (ESFP) or Response Spectrum Analysis (RSA) 58–61 .…”
Section: Challenges In Predicting Shear Amplifications Due To Higher‐...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ongoing research on higher‐mode effects has yielded many analytical equations that aim to capture the higher‐mode‐induced shear force amplification in the design process, 2–14 a broadly applicable methodology is not available yet to accurately account for the shear force amplification and changes in the shear force distribution along the height of structures due to higher‐mode effects 2,3 . As summarized in Christopoulos and Zhong, 3 most methods presented in codes and standards were based on early research on this topic that accounted for higher‐mode effects using a single amplification factor, based on the number of stories or the fundamental period of the structure under consideration, to amplify the story shear envelopes calculated by the code‐prescribed Equivalent Static Force Procedure (ESFP) or Response Spectrum Analysis (RSA) 58–61 . Figure 15(A) presents the mean story shear envelopes obtained from the shaking table tests in this paper, in comparison to the mean FE predictions as well as those estimated from code‐prescribed methods using a single amplification factor.…”
Section: Challenges In Predicting Shear Amplifications Due To Higher‐...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations