Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2021
DOI: 10.1145/3411764.3445627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards Understanding Perceptual Differences between Genuine and Face-Swapped Videos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include quality differences, where the inner face appears blurred or pixelated compared to the surrounding video (Younus & Hasan, 2020), differences in skin tone or texture between the original and new face (Ajoy et al, 2021), and inconsistent blending at the contours of the face (Shao et al, 2022). Similar artifacts are reported by humans who correctly identify deepfakes (Wöhler et al, 2021). Movement discrepancies can also serve as indicators of deepfakes.…”
Section: Puppetry Deepfakes For Emotion Perception Researchmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These include quality differences, where the inner face appears blurred or pixelated compared to the surrounding video (Younus & Hasan, 2020), differences in skin tone or texture between the original and new face (Ajoy et al, 2021), and inconsistent blending at the contours of the face (Shao et al, 2022). Similar artifacts are reported by humans who correctly identify deepfakes (Wöhler et al, 2021). Movement discrepancies can also serve as indicators of deepfakes.…”
Section: Puppetry Deepfakes For Emotion Perception Researchmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…For example, one study showed that detection accuracy ranged from 24% for high-quality deepfakes to 71% for lower-quality deepfakes (Korshunov & Marcel, 2021). Other studies have shown similar detection ranges (Köbis et al, 2021;Tahir et al, 2021;Wöhler et al, 2021). Interestingly, correct identification of videos as true recordings ranges between 60 and 75%, which is similar to the rate at which high-quality deepfakes are incorrectly labelled as genuine (Köbis et al, 2021).…”
Section: Human Detection Of Deepfakesmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Additionally, the generative architectures of these methods appear to only loosely preserve expression and gaze cues, which could have implications on human re-evaluation of the video for reference or training purposes. Face swapping methods, which are shown to enirely fool human viewers [26,27], seem better suited towards this use case, but analysis into their privacy/utility trade-off is limited.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%