2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2017.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards understanding the abundance of non-pollen palynomorphs: A comparison of fossil algae, algal pigments and sedaDNA from temperate lake sediments

Abstract: Given the increased interest in non-pollen palynomorphs (microscopic objects other than pollen identified from the pollen slides) in palaeoecological studies, it is necessary to seek a deeper understanding how reliable the obtained results are. By combining quantitative information of algal pigments and phylotaxonomical resolution from sedimentary ancient DNA (sedaDNA), we validate the richness and abundance of aquatic non-pollen palynomorphsfossil algae, in the sediment of a small temperate lake. For the firs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(44 reference statements)
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…DNA from aquatic biota compared to lipids, pigments and subfossils: The sedaDNA signal of past aquatic biota has mainly been compared to lipid, pigment, or subfossil (such as diatom frustules) records. The current view is that the DNA information in sediments degrades faster than pigments or lipids, although significant positive correlations have been observed between these different proxies [18,72,77,[137][138][139][140][141]. Studies comparing diatom diversity retrieved from sediment using morphological and genetic approaches consistently show that beta-diversity values obtained from both methods were highly comparable (i.e., the turnover is similar), whereas alpha-diversity values and taxonomic assignment datasets were not [45,[142][143][144][145][146][147].…”
Section: Sedadna Data Compared To Other Sediment Proxiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…DNA from aquatic biota compared to lipids, pigments and subfossils: The sedaDNA signal of past aquatic biota has mainly been compared to lipid, pigment, or subfossil (such as diatom frustules) records. The current view is that the DNA information in sediments degrades faster than pigments or lipids, although significant positive correlations have been observed between these different proxies [18,72,77,[137][138][139][140][141]. Studies comparing diatom diversity retrieved from sediment using morphological and genetic approaches consistently show that beta-diversity values obtained from both methods were highly comparable (i.e., the turnover is similar), whereas alpha-diversity values and taxonomic assignment datasets were not [45,[142][143][144][145][146][147].…”
Section: Sedadna Data Compared To Other Sediment Proxiesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Nannochloropsis could be detected in modern sedimentary DNA data from five north Norwegian localities 51 (Supplementary Table 6 ). In addition to LGM Andøya 41 , Nannochloropsis has either been previously reported, or unreported, but present based on our re-analysis, in eight sed aDNA records from Greenland 52 , St. Paul Island, Alaska, USA 9 , 11 , Alberta and British Columbia, Canada 10 , Latvia 53 , Qinghai, China 54 and Svalbard 50 , 55 (Supplementary Data 7 and Supplementary Fig. 12 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…The plant shoot part was rinsed with distilled water and dried in an oven at 50 • C. Then, 0.5 g of plant samples were digested by 5 mL of HNO 3 and 3 mL of H 2 O 2 in a microwave (Milestone, Italy) for 30 min, 180 • C at 2.45 Ghz and 12.25 cm [29]. Because the research focused on phytolith, the digested solution was centrifuged, and the pellet was digested with 10% KOH [30] until the solution was clean. The two solutions were combined, filtered, and analyzed by ICP-MS (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA).…”
Section: Plant Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining pellets were dried and weighed to know the ratio of phytoliths in the plant. The extracted phytoliths were digested with 10% KOH [30] by microwave (Milestone, Italy) digestion at 180 • C at 2.45 Ghz and 12.25 cm until the solution was clean. The digested solution was acidified with nitric acid, filtered, and analyzed by ICP-MS (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) at 75 amu.…”
Section: Phytolith Extraction and Analyzationmentioning
confidence: 99%