Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction With Mobile Devices and Services 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1851600.1851626
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards using embedded magnetic field sensor for around mobile device 3D interaction

Abstract: We present a new technique based on using embedded compass (magnetic) sensor for efficient use of 3D space around a mobile device for interaction with the device. Around Device Interaction (ADI) enables extending interaction space of small mobile and tangible devices beyond their physical boundary. Our proposed method is based on using compass (magnetic field) sensor integrated in new mobile devices (e.g. iPhone 3GS, G1/2 Android). In this method, a properly shaped permanent magnet (e.g. a rod, pen or a ring) … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, using simple IR proximity sensors fac-ing outwards [3] or upwards [23,24]. Magnetic field sensing has been used to track rigid motion around a device by pairing permanent magnets and magnetometers either by wearing both [4] or by using the device's built-in IMU (inertial measurement unit) [1,15,20]. Just like optical sensing solutions, magnetic field sensing can suffer from coarse sensing fidelity and input is limited to tracking a restricted number of discrete points and often with limited degrees-of-freedom (DoF).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, using simple IR proximity sensors fac-ing outwards [3] or upwards [23,24]. Magnetic field sensing has been used to track rigid motion around a device by pairing permanent magnets and magnetometers either by wearing both [4] or by using the device's built-in IMU (inertial measurement unit) [1,15,20]. Just like optical sensing solutions, magnetic field sensing can suffer from coarse sensing fidelity and input is limited to tracking a restricted number of discrete points and often with limited degrees-of-freedom (DoF).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example using infrared (IR) proximity sensors [3,23] or handheld magnetic tags [20]. Others have attempted to address the input scarcity issue by leveraging the human body [11] or surfaces in the environment [10,34] as interactive platforms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ketabdar et al [7] dealt with mobile phone interaction by using changes in magnetic field invoked by re-positioning of external magnetic material around the device. Machine learning algorithms were used for movement-based gestures classification.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other works reduce the hardware complexity even further by making use of the integrated sensors in the tablets. Ketabdar et al [7], for instance, exploit the magnetic (compass) sensor of the device, and interact around it using magnets. Unlike optical approaches, this solution is more robust to occlusion.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Probably for this reason most of them [1,7,8] require the interactions to take place close to the device. In a table-based MDE, this restriction could require that users lean over the table or even move towards the target device, which could be cumbersome and cause interference with interaction on the other devices.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%