2021
DOI: 10.1093/scipol/scab039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards wide-scale adoption of open science practices: The role of open science communities

Abstract: Despite the increasing availability of Open Science (OS) infrastructure and the rise in policies to change behaviour, OS practices are not yet the norm. While pioneering researchers are developing OS practices, the majority sticks to status quo. To transition to common practice, we must engage a critical proportion of the academic community. In this transition, OS Communities (OSCs) play a key role. OSCs are bottom-up learning groups of scholars that discuss OS within and across disciplines. They make OS knowl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, basic awareness of open science practices, and the need for change in the way research is conducted is still relatively sparse (Bueno de la Fuente, 2016 ; Heise & Pearce, 2020 ). Knowledge of open science practices is also ‘patchy’ and uptake tends to be dependent on whether research groups have a strong open science advocate in their ranks, or whether their particular research or professional organization, or leading journal, has sufficiently embraced open science practices (Armeni et al, 2021 ). There is also a substantive training deficit – few undergraduate and graduate degree programs include integral or even optional content on open science practices (Jekel et al, 2020 ; Strand & Brown, 2019 ).…”
Section: Improving Research Integrity: the Evolution Of Open Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, basic awareness of open science practices, and the need for change in the way research is conducted is still relatively sparse (Bueno de la Fuente, 2016 ; Heise & Pearce, 2020 ). Knowledge of open science practices is also ‘patchy’ and uptake tends to be dependent on whether research groups have a strong open science advocate in their ranks, or whether their particular research or professional organization, or leading journal, has sufficiently embraced open science practices (Armeni et al, 2021 ). There is also a substantive training deficit – few undergraduate and graduate degree programs include integral or even optional content on open science practices (Jekel et al, 2020 ; Strand & Brown, 2019 ).…”
Section: Improving Research Integrity: the Evolution Of Open Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that open science is yet to become standard practice among psychology researchers, I believe that adopting an open science mindset also means to become an open science advocate more broadly (see for example Armeni et al, 2021 ; The FOSTER consortium, 2021b ). Researchers can do many things to raise awareness of and advocate for open science practice.…”
Section: Features Of the Open Science ‘Mindset’mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The universities of Reading and York have organised Open Research-themed conferences; 32 35 In the Netherlands, an Open Science Communities network has evolved and is spreading internationally. 36 Champions can be supported by members of professional services and may be able to access funding to support activities, such as holding workshops, organising training sessions, attending conferences and training outside the University, and participating in external projects.…”
Section: Organise Open Research Eventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We propose that pedagogical communities play a fundamental role in incorporating open scholarship in higher education with the view to improve future research practice and culture. Pedagogical communities are educationally-oriented ‘open science communities’ [ 10 ] that make open science knowledge accessible and facilitate communication between academia and policy. They also advocate for the integration of open scholarship into higher education and raise awareness of its pedagogical implications and associated challenges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%