2018
DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201819107014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Towards wormhole beyond Horndeski

Abstract: We address the issue of whether a no-go theorem for static, spherically symmetric wormholes, proven in Horndeski theories, can be circumvented by going beyond Horndeski. We show that the ghost instabilities which are at the heart of the no-go theorem, can indeed be avoided. The wormhole solutions with the latter property are, however, strongly fine tuned, and hence it is likely that they are unstable. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether these solutions have other pathologies, like gradient instabilities al… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Diagonalizing the matrix c 2 r = 1 a 2 A −1 B with A and B given in (24) and (25), one can easily compute the speeds of propagation along the radial direction:…”
Section: Even Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagonalizing the matrix c 2 r = 1 a 2 A −1 B with A and B given in (24) and (25), one can easily compute the speeds of propagation along the radial direction:…”
Section: Even Sectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It might be also interesting to apply the EFT (24) to regulate the singularity of the BH, e.g. [46][47][48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a construction has been attempted in Ref. [33] where we presented static, spherically symmetric wormhole in beyond Horndeski theory which, we argued, did not have ghost instabilities among parity even 4 There is a claim [12,13] that there exists a stable static wormhole in a dilaton-Gauss-Bonnet gravity. This solution, however, appears unstable even against spherically symmetric perturbations [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%