1956
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.104.1213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Townsend Ionization Coefficients and Uniform Field Breakdown in Hydrogen and Nitrogen at High Pressures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A more useful comparison is how the runaway breakdown threshold compares with the conventional breakdown field for the Jovian atmospheres. The conventional breakdown field for hydrogen, the principle component, is often reported to be about half the value for air, or 1500 kV/m [ Yair et al , 1995; DeBitetto and Fisher , 1956; Cobine , 1941]. However, this threshold involves the Townsend discharge mechanism in which electrons are liberated from a cathode.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more useful comparison is how the runaway breakdown threshold compares with the conventional breakdown field for the Jovian atmospheres. The conventional breakdown field for hydrogen, the principle component, is often reported to be about half the value for air, or 1500 kV/m [ Yair et al , 1995; DeBitetto and Fisher , 1956; Cobine , 1941]. However, this threshold involves the Townsend discharge mechanism in which electrons are liberated from a cathode.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When an electron gains enough energy to ionize the gas, a cascade of electrons can be produced, called a Townsend Avalanche [30]. The current in the gas is given by:…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One would guess that it would pull in field lines within a radius comparable to its height. Thus, the average field at the end of the rod would be increased by the ratio of the two areas or by (h / r) 2 and an emitter with a ratio of 10:1 can give a field increase of 100. One can actually investigate this a little farther.…”
Section: Emitter Geometry and Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course, we have a well defined shape and microscopic changes in the shape will change the local field for distances comparable to the roughness of the point. In any case, 0.5 (h / r) 2 gives an indication of what the emitter needs to look like for a given field enhancement. An interesting question is how fast does the field fall off and approach the uniform applied field.…”
Section: Emitter Geometry and Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation