2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.08.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxic anterior segment syndrome caused by autoclave reservoir wall biofilms and their residual toxins

Abstract: None of the authors has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A significant number of reported TASS cases has occurred as clusters of outbreaks. [11][12][13][14][15] We experienced a TASS outbreak in 2 tertiary hospitals in our region. The major causes implicated in TASS outbreaks have included inadequate cleaning of surgical instruments, contamination of surgical instrument or IOLs, and adverse drug reactions to viscoelastic substances and intracameral use of cefuroxime, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] although no explainable causes have been identified in 51.7% of 60 TASS cases after uneventful cataract surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant number of reported TASS cases has occurred as clusters of outbreaks. [11][12][13][14][15] We experienced a TASS outbreak in 2 tertiary hospitals in our region. The major causes implicated in TASS outbreaks have included inadequate cleaning of surgical instruments, contamination of surgical instrument or IOLs, and adverse drug reactions to viscoelastic substances and intracameral use of cefuroxime, [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] although no explainable causes have been identified in 51.7% of 60 TASS cases after uneventful cataract surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If presenting with corneal edema and endothelial dysfunction 12–48 h after anterior segment surgery, acute toxic anterior segment syndrome (TASS) should be considered. This is by definition a non-infectious inflammatory reaction with many potential causes including ointments, preservatives, retention of sterilization detergent, abnormal pH or salt concentration, trypan blue, trace metal deposits, and denatured viscoelastic material [7277]. These causes of corneal edema after posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation discussed above are not all true endotheliitis, yet should be considered in the differential of possible corneal endotheliitis.…”
Section: Procedural Causesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the severity of inflammation, other symptoms may be present, such as pain, conjunctival injection or chemosis, hypopyon, corneal edema, keratic precipitates, anterior vitreous opacities, macular edema and visual deterioration [ 1 , 6 , 7 , 13 ]. Most reported cases of TASS have been anecdotal, and therefore the clinical manifestations vary widely as shown in Table 1 [ 9 , 10 , 14 17 ]. However, in 2015 and 2017, two large case-series studies ( n = 251 and n = 147) were conducted in Japan [ 8 , 18 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…no.) Number of cases Onset (days after the surgery) Inciting agents Clinical presentations Managements (n) Visual outcomes (n) Miyake et al [ 19 ] 6 42–167 IOL (ISert model 251, Hoya) Chemosis, Ciliary injection, Decreased BCVA, Corneal edema, Anterior chamber reaction, hypopyon Vitretomy and IOL removal (1), Capsule irrigation (2), Medical treatment only (5) BCVA 20/100 (1), BCVA ≥20/30 (5) Suzuki et al [ 18 ] 251 38.44 ± 32.29 Range:0–161 IOL (ISert model 251 and 255, Hoya) Anterior chamber reaction (99.2%), conjunctival injection (41.4%) Hypopyon (22.7%) Corneal edema (19.1%) Keratic precipitates (27.9%) Medical treatment only (142), Surgical intervention: vitrectomy (49), IOL removal (22), chamber irrigation (51) BCVA 0.036 ± 0.242 logMAR Sorenson et al [ 10 ] 10 1–7 Bacterial biofilm contamination of autoclave reservoir Anterior chamber reaction (10), Hypopyon (3), Corneal edema (1), Anterior vitreous reaction (4) Medical treatment only (3), Vitreous tap and intravitreal injection (7) No light perception (1), BCVA≥20/30 (9) Ohika et al [ 8 ] 147 13.1 ± 16.4 Range: 1–88 IOL (Acrysof, Alcon) Anterior chamber reaction (97.2%), Conjunctival injection (39.8%), Fibrinous inflammation (43.1%) Hypopyon (22.7%) Corneal edema (15.6%) Keratic precipitates (21.6%), Ocular pain (9.5%) Medical treatment only (104), Surgical intervention: vitrectomy (21), IOL removal (10), chamber irrigation (33) BCVA> 20/40 (143), BCVA≤20/40 (4) Moyle et al [ 9 ] 11 1 unknown Corneal edema (11), anterior chamber reaction (10), Inflammatory plaque on IOL (5), hypopyon (3), fibrin reaction (6), mild pain (2) Medical treatment only (11) BCVA = 20/20 (11) Sengupta et al [ 7 ] 60 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation