2005
DOI: 10.1002/tox.20090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicities of triclosan, phenol, and copper sulfate in activated sludge

Abstract: The effect of toxicants on the BOD degradation rate constant was used to quantitatively establish the toxicity of triclosan, phenol, and copper (II) against activated sludge microorganisms. Toxicities were tested over the following ranges of concentrations: 0-450 mg/L for phenol, 0-2 mg/L for triclosan, and 0-35 mg/L for copper sulfate (pentahydrate). According to the EC 50 values, triclosan was the most toxic compound tested (EC 50 ¼ 1.82 6 0.1 mg/L), copper (II) had intermediate toxicity (EC 50 ¼ 18.3 6 0.37… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Concentrations toxic to algae also are in the parts-per-billion range, with values of 0.2 – 2.8 µg/l for TCS and 10 – 30 µg/l for TCC (Consortium 2002, Orvos et al 2002, Reiss et al 2002, Samosoe-Petersen et al 2003, Yang et al 2008). Inhibitory effects on microorganisms were shown to begin at levels ranging from 25 – 80,000 µg/l for TCS and 100,000 – 40,000,000 µg/l for TCC (Consortium 2002, Federle et al 2002, Samosoe-Petersen et al 2003, Sivaraman et al 2004, Neumegen et al 2005, Stasinakis et al 2007, Farre et al 2008, Stickler and Jones 2008). Readers will note that the upper range minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) reported are well in excess of published solubility limits for both biocides discussed here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Concentrations toxic to algae also are in the parts-per-billion range, with values of 0.2 – 2.8 µg/l for TCS and 10 – 30 µg/l for TCC (Consortium 2002, Orvos et al 2002, Reiss et al 2002, Samosoe-Petersen et al 2003, Yang et al 2008). Inhibitory effects on microorganisms were shown to begin at levels ranging from 25 – 80,000 µg/l for TCS and 100,000 – 40,000,000 µg/l for TCC (Consortium 2002, Federle et al 2002, Samosoe-Petersen et al 2003, Sivaraman et al 2004, Neumegen et al 2005, Stasinakis et al 2007, Farre et al 2008, Stickler and Jones 2008). Readers will note that the upper range minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) reported are well in excess of published solubility limits for both biocides discussed here.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 NOEC = no-observed effects concentration; LOEC = lowest observed effects concentration; LC 50 = median lethal dose; EC 50 = half-maximal effective concentration; EC 100 = maximal effective concentration; IC 25 = growth inhibition of 25% concentration; IC 50 = growth inhibition of 50% concentration; MIC = minimum inhibitory concentration 2 Orvos et al 2002 3 Consortium 2002 4 Ishibashi et al 2004 5 Tatarazako et al 2004 6 Samosoe-Petersen et al 2003 7 Reiss et al 2002 8 Yange et al 2008 9 Neumegen et al 2005 10 Stasinakis et al 2007 11 Federle et al 2002 12 Sivaraman et al 2004 13 Stickler and Jones 2008 14 Farre et al 2008. …”
Section: Figures and Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that synthetic chemicals, which are commonly used in dental products such as toothpastes and oral mouthwashes, can induce tooth discoloration, cell toxicity, regurgitation, or diarrhea [47, 48]. Thus, plant extracts are considered to be potent alternative compounds for the new generation of oral pharmaceuticals.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Antibacterial agents used in the prevention and treatment of oral diseases, including cetylpyridinium chloride, chlorhexidine, fluorinated amines or products containing such agents might show undesired effects such as dental staining or, in the case of ethanol commonly found in mouthwash, in relation to the development of oral cancer (Knoll-Kohler and Stiebel, 2002;Lachenmeier, 2008;Mccullough and Farah, 2008;Neumegen et al, 2005;Rodrigues et al, 2007). Thus, the search for alternative products and phytochemical isolates in plants used in traditional medicine is considered a good alternative over synthetic drugs (Prabu et al, 2006).…”
Section: Antibiofilm Activity Of Natural Substancesmentioning
confidence: 99%