1966
DOI: 10.1080/00039896.1966.10664358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicity and Fate of Insecticide Residues in Water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1970
1970
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dissipation of residues was rapid due to rapid stream flow and within 45 min half of the initial concentration was lost. This agrees with the short TD50 value reported earlier for carbaryl in running water by Back (1965) and Lichtenstein et al (1966). However, the present value differed considerably from the ones (1.7 to 6.0 d) reported by Eichelberger and Lichtenberg (1971), Osman and Belal (1980) and Stanley and Trial (1980).…”
Section: Forest Litter and Soilsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Dissipation of residues was rapid due to rapid stream flow and within 45 min half of the initial concentration was lost. This agrees with the short TD50 value reported earlier for carbaryl in running water by Back (1965) and Lichtenstein et al (1966). However, the present value differed considerably from the ones (1.7 to 6.0 d) reported by Eichelberger and Lichtenberg (1971), Osman and Belal (1980) and Stanley and Trial (1980).…”
Section: Forest Litter and Soilsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Available data on the water solubility of D D T vary by as much as three orders of magnitude, namely from 0.001 to 1.0 ppm (6,7,8). In our experiments, DDT was diminished by between 70% and less than 30% after 6 and 12 weeks (Tables 1 to 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 44%
“…This result is similar to the pH 7·6 optimum found by Ishida and Dahm (1965) for the attack on y-HCH by housefly enzyme preparations. Similarly, degradation of y-HCH in mud was found to be most rapid at pH 7 and 9 with some persistence at pH 5 (Lichtenstein et al 1966). However, a common feature of that study and the present one is that at pH 9 and 10 some alkaline dehydrochlorination of the y-HCH to y-PCCH (Yule et al 1967) or other undetected products may have accounted for the loss of some of the y-HCH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%