2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2011.08.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicity and metabolic costs of the Atlantic stingray (Dasyatis sabina) venom delivery system in relation to its role in life history

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, whether the production of venom really represents a substantial metabolic cost is still a matter of debate [50,72], and very few studies have actually investigated the metabolic costs of venom production. While most of these studies did demonstrate a higher metabolic rate after venom expenditure compared to a resting state [73,74,75,76,77,78], it has also been reported that in comparison with, for example, molting or food digestion, the metabolic costs of venom expenditure (at least for snakes) seem fairly low [72,73,75]. The energetic costs of venom production may therefore not be as high as often suggested.…”
Section: Venom Modulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, whether the production of venom really represents a substantial metabolic cost is still a matter of debate [50,72], and very few studies have actually investigated the metabolic costs of venom production. While most of these studies did demonstrate a higher metabolic rate after venom expenditure compared to a resting state [73,74,75,76,77,78], it has also been reported that in comparison with, for example, molting or food digestion, the metabolic costs of venom expenditure (at least for snakes) seem fairly low [72,73,75]. The energetic costs of venom production may therefore not be as high as often suggested.…”
Section: Venom Modulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is uncertain if other fish species also utilise venom in this way. However, it has been suggested that the venom apparatus of stingrays has evolved primarily for a role in intraspecific aggressive encounters [ 79 ]. The reasons for this hypothesis are the relatively low toxicity and low metabolic cost of the venom, the use of the sting on conspecific individuals, and observations that the sting is not used on attacking predators.…”
Section: Evolving a Venom Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reasons for this hypothesis are the relatively low toxicity and low metabolic cost of the venom, the use of the sting on conspecific individuals, and observations that the sting is not used on attacking predators. Although defensive stingray barbs injure many people worldwide every year, it has been noted that when handling them, they generally sting very reluctantly [ 79 , 80 ]. The primary role of the relatively non-damaging venom may therefore be in social interactions.…”
Section: Evolving a Venom Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chemical defences are common evolutionary adaptations for defence against predators as well as pathogens [2,3]. The production and maintenance of chemical defences, as well as the systems to deliver them, represent an energetic investment that occurs at the expense of allocation to other life-history traits [4][5][6]. The concept that venoms and toxins represent an expensive and limited resource in animals has led to formulation of 'optimization hypotheses', which predict that individuals should gauge the use of their chemical defences and apply them judiciously [7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%