2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(03)00298-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicity identification evaluation of leachates from municipal solid waste landfills: a multispecies approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
63
1
8

Year Published

2004
2004
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
11
63
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…TIE consisits of three phases: Phase I (Characterization) characterizes the physical and chemical natures of the constituents causing toxicity; Phase II (Identification) isolates and identifies the toxicants characterized in Phase I with the aid of chemical analytical techniques and toxicity evaluation (Hogan et al, 2005) and Phase III (Confirmation) confirms the true toxicant responsible for the toxicity (USEPA, 1993b). For the examination of WET and TIE, various aquatic species can be selected as the test species, such as Daphnia magna, Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (Deanovic et al, 1999), Danio rerio, Ceriodaphnia dubia and Pimephales promelas (Fjällborg et al, 2006;Hogan et al, 2005;Isidori et al, 2003;Ra et al, 2007;Strom et al, 2009;USEPA, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TIE consisits of three phases: Phase I (Characterization) characterizes the physical and chemical natures of the constituents causing toxicity; Phase II (Identification) isolates and identifies the toxicants characterized in Phase I with the aid of chemical analytical techniques and toxicity evaluation (Hogan et al, 2005) and Phase III (Confirmation) confirms the true toxicant responsible for the toxicity (USEPA, 1993b). For the examination of WET and TIE, various aquatic species can be selected as the test species, such as Daphnia magna, Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (Deanovic et al, 1999), Danio rerio, Ceriodaphnia dubia and Pimephales promelas (Fjällborg et al, 2006;Hogan et al, 2005;Isidori et al, 2003;Ra et al, 2007;Strom et al, 2009;USEPA, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These differences can be firstly explained by water flea sensitivity. Detection capabilities of the ecotoxicity of the leachate are actually dependent on the test used [62,63] and it has been already shown that V. fischeri was generally less sensitive than D. magna [10,64]. Instead of these tests, experiments by using bacterial strains allowed to determine and quantify the element which was potentially bioavailable and/or toxic for bacteria [50].…”
Section: Relevance Of Ecotoxicity Tests For Risk Assessment Posed Bymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Si estos lixiviados si no se manejan convenientemente pueden suponer, tanto en vertederos activos como en vertederos clausurados, la principal fuente de contaminación de las aguas subterráneas y superficiales (Ding et al 2001;Flyhammar. 1997;Hancock et al 1995;Isidori et al 2003).…”
Section: Conclusionesunclassified
“…De hecho los lixiviados procedentes de vertederos activos y clausurados pueden suponer la principal fuente de contaminación de las aguas subterráneas y superficiales (Ding et al 2001;Flyhammar. 1997;Hancock et al 1995;Isidori et al 2003). La migración de los lixiviados del vertedero al medioambiente puede ocurrir de varias maneras; por un flujo incontrolado, por escorrentía superficial, por subsidencia o por infiltración, de este modo una de las prácticas utilizadas para evitar riesgos es el bombeo y la descarga de estos lixiviados en plantas de tratamiento de aguas residuales (Isidori et al 2003).…”
Section: Anexo Vii: Cálculo Del Volumen De Lixiviados Vii1 Introducciónunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation