1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf01683531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicity of perchloroethylene, trichloroethylene, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, and methylene chloride to fathead minnows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is an acknowledged principle that, for a solvent to be able to penetrate into the fibre, the solvent solubility parameter should closely match that of the polymer [25,26]. For the present investigation, dichloromethane was considered as an alternative to perchloroethylene as, although it presents some safety issues that may be addressed by adopting careful laboratory practice, it is currently the most commonly used chlorinated organic laboratory solvent [27]. From a practical perspective, dyes 1-6 were found to be highly soluble in dichloromethane and its solubility parameter (20.2 J 0.5 cm À1.5 ) is comparable with that of perchloroethylene (20.3 J 0.5 cm À1.5 ), matching favourably that of poly(ethyleneterephthalate) (21.4 J 0.5 cm À1.5 ) [28][29][30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is an acknowledged principle that, for a solvent to be able to penetrate into the fibre, the solvent solubility parameter should closely match that of the polymer [25,26]. For the present investigation, dichloromethane was considered as an alternative to perchloroethylene as, although it presents some safety issues that may be addressed by adopting careful laboratory practice, it is currently the most commonly used chlorinated organic laboratory solvent [27]. From a practical perspective, dyes 1-6 were found to be highly soluble in dichloromethane and its solubility parameter (20.2 J 0.5 cm À1.5 ) is comparable with that of perchloroethylene (20.3 J 0.5 cm À1.5 ), matching favourably that of poly(ethyleneterephthalate) (21.4 J 0.5 cm À1.5 ) [28][29][30].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, this chlorinated solvent was more toxic to Artemia salina than other test organisms such as Mysidopsis bahia, Pimephales promelas and Cyprinodon variegatus. A 96 hr-LC 50 of 256 mg/L and 310 mg/L has been reported for the mysid shrimp and the fathead minnow respectively (LeBlanc 1984;Alexander et al 1978). Heitmuller et al (1981) Alexander et al ( 1978) determined a 96 hr-LC 50 of 105 mg 1,1,1-trichloroethane/L, 21.4 mg 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethylene/L and 66.8 mg l,l,l-trichloroethylene/L for Pimephales promelas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 96 hr-LC 50 of 256 mg/L and 310 mg/L has been reported for the mysid shrimp and the fathead minnow respectively (LeBlanc 1984;Alexander et al 1978). Heitmuller et al (1981) Alexander et al ( 1978) determined a 96 hr-LC 50 of 105 mg 1,1,1-trichloroethane/L, 21.4 mg 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethylene/L and 66.8 mg l,l,l-trichloroethylene/L for Pimephales promelas. These results suggest that Artemia salina 24-h old was more resistent to both 1,1,1-trichloroethane and 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethylene than Pimephales promelas, whereas 48-and 72-hr old larvae presented higher sensitivity than this fish.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier reports indicate that small fish species are also susceptible to the toxicity produced by TRI [17,18] and other CYP‐activated compounds [19,20]. Although neither CYP2E1 protein or CYP2E1‐mediated activity has been reported in the liver of Japanese medaka ( Oryzias latipes ), CYP1A‐dependent activity is clearly evident in this species [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%