2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicity potential of disinfection agent in tannery wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Generally, all effl uents contain N values in the range between 3 and 10 mg per L [15], that are the limit values specifi ed for directly discharge into the surface water. The COD values of soaking effl uents were determined lower than the previously reported values [42,48]. With the use of 1 wt% of tannic acid instead of bactericide, the COD values of soaking effl uents were reduced approximately by 33% ( Table 2).…”
Section: Nitrogen and Cod Values Of Soaking Effl Uentsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, all effl uents contain N values in the range between 3 and 10 mg per L [15], that are the limit values specifi ed for directly discharge into the surface water. The COD values of soaking effl uents were determined lower than the previously reported values [42,48]. With the use of 1 wt% of tannic acid instead of bactericide, the COD values of soaking effl uents were reduced approximately by 33% ( Table 2).…”
Section: Nitrogen and Cod Values Of Soaking Effl Uentsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Their use in leather industry has become the focus because of the chemical safety and consumer health issues considering their toxic effect for wastewater, aquatic organisms and environment. The toxicity of bactericides and fungicides in tannery effl uents was confi rmed by determination of their extremely high acute and chronic toxic effects on bacteria, algae, zebra fi sh and daphnids such as Daphnia magna and Danio rerio [48]. They may impair fertility, cause harm to the unborn child and potential heritable genetic damage [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the reported literature, leather industries are associated with water and land contamination and number of health problem (Battista et al 1995;Bianchi et al 1997;Mikoczy et al 1996). As a result of leather industry pollution, a large number of health effects have been occurring to crops, aquatic, terrestrial biota and humans (Barnhart 1997), toxicity on Vibrio fischeri (Jochimsen and Jekel 1997) and Daphnia magna (Tisler et al 2004). To overcome these problems, various literatures have been reported for the assessment of leather industry wastewater (Zhanga and Zhang 2007), evaluation of chromium toxicity (Oral et al 2007;Scholz and Lucas 2003;Cassano et al 2001Cassano et al , 2003Meric et al 2005;Viero et al 2002), and removal of endocrine disrupting compounds (Changa et al 2009) present in the wastewater from leather industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of toxicity monitoring and removal studies have been performed on leather tanning wastewater including acute toxicity on Vibrio fisheri , Daphnia magna [2,[10][11], sea urchins and marine algae [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%