2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2023.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicity prediction using target, interactome, and pathway profiles as descriptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several different fields of computational chemistry have already experienced the benefits given by artificial intelligence, with a special focus on the early discovery environment [138,139]. One very relevant example is represented by on-target and off-target effect predictions in computational toxicology [140][141][142], which is configured in the family of AI-based methods for target prediction based only on ligand chemical data. On the structure-based side, deltalearning [143], deep learning-based 3D pocket mapping [144], and AI rescoring techniques have been developed and documented in the recent years.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several different fields of computational chemistry have already experienced the benefits given by artificial intelligence, with a special focus on the early discovery environment [138,139]. One very relevant example is represented by on-target and off-target effect predictions in computational toxicology [140][141][142], which is configured in the family of AI-based methods for target prediction based only on ligand chemical data. On the structure-based side, deltalearning [143], deep learning-based 3D pocket mapping [144], and AI rescoring techniques have been developed and documented in the recent years.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of read-across analyses, binary chemical fingerprints are extensively used for constructing predictive models for diverse biological activities. ,, To be successful, a read-across approach based on structural similarity requires more than just comparing pairs of compounds; it involves grouping multiple compounds with similar chemical structures. ,, However, analyzing data sets like Tox21, which contain a large number of compounds ( n = 8435), presents challenges due to the high-dimensional nature of chemical fingerprints. This complexity complicates the direct association of these fingerprints with HTS results (Figure A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a regulatory perspective, for read-across to be acceptable, several factors must be considered, including structural similarity, common metabolites, similar toxicokinetic profiles, comparable physicochemical properties, and shared biological targets and metabolic pathways. Although structural similarity alone may not be sufficient to justify read-across predictions, the Read-Across Assessment Framework guideline issued by the European Chemicals Agency requires that any read-across approach must be based on structural similarity between the source and target substances as a prerequisite . Thus, diverse chemical fingerprint-based similarity comparisons have been commonly used in in silico read-across to predict biological activity or toxicity of chemicals. ,,,, …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variability is not merely a footnote but a central consideration in the development of predictive models. Füzi et al’s 54 introduction of a systems biology approach, utilizing target, interactome, and pathway profiles, offers a fresh lens through which to view hepatotoxicity mechanisms. This approach is not just another method but also a potential revolution in understanding the biological intricacies of DILI.…”
Section: Advances In the Prediction Of Toxicity End Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%