2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2014.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toxicogenomic markers for corticosteroid treatment in beef cattle: Integrated analysis of transcriptomic data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Very poor information could be extrapolated from microarray results in skeletal muscle tissue, apart from the confirmation of a putative bias towards cell differentiation rather than proliferation which was already showed for other anabolic growth promoter treatments [41][42] . The PDN treatment seemed indeed to affect single unrelated genes in bovine muscle rather to regulate more complex pathways or processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Very poor information could be extrapolated from microarray results in skeletal muscle tissue, apart from the confirmation of a putative bias towards cell differentiation rather than proliferation which was already showed for other anabolic growth promoter treatments [41][42] . The PDN treatment seemed indeed to affect single unrelated genes in bovine muscle rather to regulate more complex pathways or processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The training set (n = 6401) was further split in 100 training and 100 test sets and the model was trained in a Monte Carlo bootstrap resampling scheme (37,38,39,40) with B = 100 external training/test splits separately for each of the three scenarios -one model was learned from each of these training sets and validated on the corresponding test set resulting in 100 different scores of the method performance. In addition, as LASSO selects a number of variables significant for prediction of T2D for each model, we obtained 100 lists of variables that can be ranked based on the number of times a variable is selected by different models allowing us to rank the variables based on their ability to predict the onset of T2D being robust to overfitting (38,39,40). The training data were scaled with respect to their maximum and used to train three models, one for each scenario, using the package 'survival' in R (36).…”
Section: The Prediction Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, regarding DEX effects on cattle, different transcriptomics and proteomic studies have been proposed to firstly identify candidate biomarkers of exposure [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ] and then validate their application in field samples [ 15 , 16 ]. However, the attempts to merge different sources of biological information to enhance the detection of such illicit practices, e.g., a combination of image analysis, immunohistology and gene expression studies, are currently limited to other classes of growth promoters such as sex steroids [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%